Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29207208›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018

CrossTalk opposing view: dynamic cerebral autoregulation should be quantified using induced (rather than spontaneous) blood pressure fluctuations.

David Simpson, Jurgen Claassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Assessment of cerebral autoregulation in stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies at rest.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Directional sensitivity of dynamic cerebral autoregulation during spontaneous fluctuations in arterial blood pressure at rest.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The INfoMATAS project: Methods for assessing cerebral autoregulation in stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Review
  8. Integrative physiological assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism in acute ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cerebral critical closing pressure and resistance-area product: the influence of dynamic cerebral autoregulation, age and sex.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David SimpsonInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jurgen ClaassenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine (925), Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-8151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Blood Flow VelocityBlood PressureCerebrovascular CirculationHomeostasisHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicStress, Physiologicalblood pressurecerebral blood flowcerebral circulation

Identifiers

PMID29207208
PMCPMC5746528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.