ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2018
The cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann syndrome scale.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 300 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
300 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 460 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Patients with Cerebellar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Cognition in cerebellar disorders: What's in the profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Cognition in Chiari Malformation Type I: an Update of a Systematic Review.Neuropsychology review · 2024Pooled it
- Neurocognitive Changes in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: A Systematic Review with a Narrative Design.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- The cognitive profile of Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Neuroimaging studies in persistent postural-perceptual dizziness and related disease: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Home-based Hybrid Assistive Limb Lumbar Type Telerehabilitation in Spinocerebellar Ataxias: A Nonrandomized Open-label Trial.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Trial
- Electrical stimulation of the cerebellum facilitates automatic but not controlled word retrieval.Brain structure & function · 2023Trial
- Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Trial
- Article
- Longitudinal Changes and Responsiveness of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale in Patients with Acute Cerebellar Stroke.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Observational
- MR spectroscopy of the cerebellum in gluten ataxia and gluten encephalopathy.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- From Contrasts to Representations: Rethinking fMRI Approaches for Cortico-Cerebellar Networks.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- Remote Online-Based Application of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Convergent validity, responsiveness, and meaningful within-subject change of the PROM-Ataxia in spinocerebellar ataxias.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Persistent executive, visuospatial, and conceptual deficits after right posterior cerebellar infarction.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Neuroimmunology of Oral Cancer: Tumor Progression, Systemic Inflammation, and Neural Circuit Dysfunction from the Cerebellum to the Frontal Cortex.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- The CCAS-Scale in Chiari Malformation Type I: A Cerebellar-Focused Cognitive Assessment with Clinical Utility.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Chiari I Malformation as a Human Disease Model of Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Dysfunction.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
240 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS; Schmahmann's syndrome) is characterized by deficits in executive function, linguistic processing, spatial cognition, and affect regulation. Diagnosis currently relies on detailed neuropsychological testing. The aim of this study was to develop an office or bedside cognitive screen to help identify CCAS in cerebellar patients. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether available brief tests of mental function detect cognitive impairment in cerebellar patients, whether cognitive performance is different in patients with isolated cerebellar lesions versus complex cerebrocerebellar pathology, and whether there are cognitive deficits that should raise red flags about extra-cerebellar pathology. Comprehensive standard neuropsychological tests, experimental measures and clinical rating scales were administered to 77 patients with cerebellar disease-36 isolated cerebellar degeneration or injury, and 41 complex cerebrocerebellar pathology-and to healthy matched controls. Tests that differentiated patients from controls were used to develop a screening instrument that includes the cardinal elements of CCAS. We validated this new scale in a new cohort of 39 cerebellar patients and 55 healthy controls. We confirm the defining features of CCAS using neuropsychological measures. Deficits in executive function were most pronounced for working memory, mental flexibility, and abstract reasoning. Language deficits included verb for noun generation and phonemic > semantic fluency. Visual spatial function was degraded in performance and interpretation of visual stimuli. Neuropsychiatric features included impairments in attentional control, emotional control, psychosis spectrum disorders and social skill set. From these results, we derived a 10-item scale providing total raw score, cut-offs for each test, and pass/fail criteria that determined 'possible' (one test failed), 'probable' (two tests failed), and 'definite' CCAS (three tests failed). When applied to the exploratory cohort, and administered to the validation cohort, the CCAS/Schmahmann scale identified sensitivity and selectivity, respectively as possible exploratory cohort: 85%/74%, validation cohort: 95%/78%; probable exploratory cohort: 58%/94%, validation cohort: 82%/93%; and definite exploratory cohort: 48%/100%, validation cohort: 46%/100%. In patients in the exploratory cohort, Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were within normal range. Complex cerebrocerebellar disease patients were impaired on similarities in comparison to isolated cerebellar disease. Inability to recall words from multiple choice occurred only in patients with extra-cerebellar disease. The CCAS/Schmahmann syndrome scale is useful for expedited clinical assessment of CCAS in patients with cerebellar disorders.awx317media15678692096001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.