ArticlePloS one2017
The prognostic value of asymmetric dimethylarginine in patients with cardiac syndrome X.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Biomarkers in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Review
- Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine is associated with vulnerable plaque and long-term outcomes in stable coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Updates on Pharmacologic Management of Microvascular Angina.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pathophysiology of cardiac syndrome X is multifactorial and endothelial dysfunction has been implicated as important contributing factor. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), characterized as a circulating endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, may have been implicated as an important contributing factor for the development of endothelial dysfunction. In this study, we aim to assess the predictive power of ADMA for long-term prognosis in patients with cardiac syndrome X. METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled 239 consecutive patients with cardiac syndrome X diagnosed by coronary angiography. The mean age was 58.7±10.1 years. The patients were grouped into tertiles according to the plasma ADMA levels: <0.38 μmol/l (tertile I), 0.38-0.44 μmol/l (tertile II), and >0.44 μmol/l (tertile III). All patients were followed up for a mean period of 6.5±1.5 years (median: 6.3 years, inter-quartile range: 5.7-8.0 years). During the follow-up period, major adverse events (MAE) were observed in 15 patients (6.3%), including 13 deaths. The plasma ADMA levels in patients who developed MAE were significantly higher than those who did not (0.48±0.06 μmol/l vs. 0.42±0.08 μmol/l, p = 0.005). In multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, eGFR and LVEF, ADMA tertile I and II were identify to be associated with a significantly lower risk of MAE compared to ADMA tertile III (p = 0.017). By considering the plasma ADMA level as a continuous variable, the plasma ADMA level remained a significant independent predictor for outcomes of MAE, and the relative risk of MACE increased by 50% when plasma ADMA level increased by 1 SD of value (p = 0.018).
conclusionsIn patients with cardiac syndrome X, elevated plasma ADMA levels appeared to be an independent predictor of long-term adverse clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.