Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205920›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2018

Multiorgan Microphysiological Systems for Drug Development: Strategies, Advances, and Challenges.

Ying I Wang, Carlos Carmona, James J Hickman, Michael L Shuler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Innovative micro physiological systems for vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Modeling human placental biology: a review of organoid technologies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying I WangNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0236-5962
Carlos CarmonaNanoScience Technology Center, University of Central Florida, 12424 Research Parkway Suite 400, Orlando, FL, 32826, USA.
James J HickmanNanoScience Technology Center, University of Central Florida, 12424 Research Parkway Suite 400, Orlando, FL, 32826, USA.
Michael L ShulerNancy E. and Peter C. Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

Populating MPS database with data from multi-organ, human-on-a-chip microphysiological systemsR44TR001326 · NCATS · HESPEROS, LLC · PI HICKMAN, JAMES J, SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2016 to 2021
$6.5M
An In Vitro Model of Stem Cell Innervation of MyotubesR01NS050452 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI HICKMAN, JAMES J · 2005 to 2020
$6.4M
NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR001326NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional cell culture and animal models utilized for preclinical drug screening have led to high attrition rates of drug candidates in clinical trials due to their low predictive power for human response. Alternative models using human cells to build in vitro biomimetics of the human body with physiologically relevant organ-organ interactions hold great potential to act as "human surrogates" and provide more accurate prediction of drug effects in humans. This review is a comprehensive investigation into the development of tissue-engineered human cell-based microscale multiorgan models, or multiorgan microphysiological systems for drug testing. The evolution from traditional models to macro- and microscale multiorgan systems is discussed in regards to the rationale for recent global efforts in multiorgan microphysiological systems. Current advances in integrating cell culture and on-chip analytical technologies, as well as proof-of-concept applications for these multiorgan microsystems are discussed. Major challenges for the field, such as reproducibility and physiological relevance, are discussed with comparisons of the strengths and weaknesses of various systems to solve these challenges. Conclusions focus on the current development stage of multiorgan microphysiological systems and new trends in the field.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsDrug DevelopmentDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansTissue Engineeringbody-on-a-chipdrug developmentfunctional readoutsmicrophysiological systemsPBPK

Identifiers

PMID29205920
PMCPMC5805562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.