Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205671›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Fronto-parietal coding of goal-directed actions performed by artificial agents.

Aleksandra Kupferberg, Marco Iacoboni, Virginia Flanagin, Markus Huber, Anna Kasparbauer, Thomas Baumgartner, Gregor Hasler, Florian Schmidt, Christoph Borst, Stefan Glasauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observation-related activity in the human motor cortex increases with effector anthropomorphicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Sharing errors with human and non-human agents.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring EEG Responses during Observation of Actions Performed by Human Actor and Humanoid Robot.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aleksandra KupferbergDivision of Molecular Psychiatry, Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0849-8064
Marco IacoboniDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Brain Research Institute, Los Angeles, California.
Virginia FlanaginGerman Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders DSGZ, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, München, Germany.
Markus HuberCenter for Sensorimotor Research, Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, München, Germany.
Anna KasparbauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas BaumgartnerDepartment of Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gregor HaslerDivision of Molecular Psychiatry, Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Florian SchmidtDepartment of Robotics, DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Bavaria, Germany.
Christoph BorstDepartment of Robotics, DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Bavaria, Germany.
Stefan GlasauerGerman Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders DSGZ, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in technology, artificial agents such as humanoid robots will soon become a part of our daily lives. For safe and intuitive collaboration, it is important to understand the goals behind their motor actions. In humans, this process is mediated by changes in activity in fronto-parietal brain areas. The extent to which these areas are activated when observing artificial agents indicates the naturalness and easiness of interaction. Previous studies indicated that fronto-parietal activity does not depend on whether the agent is human or artificial. However, it is unknown whether this activity is modulated by observing grasping (self-related action) and pointing actions (other-related action) performed by an artificial agent depending on the action goal. Therefore, we designed an experiment in which subjects observed human and artificial agents perform pointing and grasping actions aimed at two different object categories suggesting different goals. We found a signal increase in the bilateral inferior parietal lobule and the premotor cortex when tool versus food items were pointed to or grasped by both agents, probably reflecting the association of hand actions with the functional use of tools. Our results show that goal attribution engages the fronto-parietal network not only for observing a human but also a robotic agent for both self-related and social actions. The debriefing after the experiment has shown that actions of human-like artificial agents can be perceived as being goal-directed. Therefore, humans will be able to interact with service robots intuitively in various domains such as education, healthcare, public service, and entertainment.

Indexed as

GoalsAdultBrain MappingFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMotion PerceptionParietal LobeSocial PerceptionTheory of MindYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29205671
PMCPMC6866499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.