Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205451›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2018

Subdermal Ultrasound Contrast Agent Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Identification: An Analysis of Safety and Contrast Agent Dose in Healthy Volunteers.

Priscilla Machado, Maria Stanczak, Ji-Bin Liu, Jason N Moore, John R Eisenbrey, Laurence Needleman, Walter K Kraft, Flemming Forsberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Excision Using Lymphosonography.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priscilla MachadoDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maria StanczakDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ji-Bin LiuDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jason N MooreDepartments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John R EisenbreyDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laurence NeedlemanDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Walter K KraftDepartments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Flemming ForsbergDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-1371

Funding

Contrast Ultrasound Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer PatientsR01CA172336 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI FORSBERG, FLEMMING · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
US Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in MelanomaR01CA100370 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDBERG, BARRY B. · 2004 to 2006
$952k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100370NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMapping of the lymphatic chain for identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is an important aspect of predicting outcomes for patients with breast cancer, and it is usually performed as an intraoperative procedure using blue dye and/or radiopharmaceutical agents. Recently, the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been proposed as an alternative imaging technique for this mapping. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of subdermal administration of the ultrasound (US) contrast agent Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) in terms of patient safety and to select the dose to be used for lymphatic applications in humans.

methodsThis study was performed in 12 female volunteers who received bilateral subdermal injections of Sonazoid (1 or 2 mL dose) in the mid-upper outer quadrant of their breasts at 2 different time points. Contrast-enhanced US examinations were performed 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours after injection to identify SLNs.

resultsSentinel lymph nodes were identified within the first hour after injection as enhanced structures, and there was no significant difference by dose in the number of SLNs identified (P = .74). The volunteers only had minor adverse experiences (AEs) that resolved completely without intervention by study completion.

conclusionsThe subdermal use of Sonazoid in this study showed only minor local and nonsignificant AEs that were completely resolved without any intervention. Two different doses were compared with no significant differences observed between them. Hence, the lower dose studied (1 mL) was selected for use in future clinical studies.

Indexed as

AdultContrast MediaFemaleFerric CompoundsHumansImage EnhancementIronMiddle AgedOxidesReference ValuesSentinel Lymph NodeUltrasonography, MammaryYoung AdultContrast MediaFerric CompoundsIronOxidesSonazoidbreast (diagnostic)contrast agents (clinical)lymph nodessafetysentinel lymph nodeultrasound

Identifiers

PMID29205451
PMCPMC5988650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.