Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205322›Full record

ArticleClinical genetics2018

A targeted sequencing panel identifies rare damaging variants in multiple genes in the cranial neural tube defect, anencephaly.

M Ishida, T Cullup, C Boustred, C James, J Docker, C English, GOSgene, N Lench, A J Copp, G E Moore and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole exome-based variant profiling and functional network characterization in neural tube defects.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mild features of partialFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Systems biology analysis of human genomes points to key pathways conferring spina bifida risk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M IshidaGenetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4769-2273
T CullupGreat Ormond Street Hospital North East Thames Regional Genetics Service Laboratories, London, UK.
C BoustredGreat Ormond Street Hospital North East Thames Regional Genetics Service Laboratories, London, UK.
C JamesGenetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
J DockerGreat Ormond Street Hospital North East Thames Regional Genetics Service Laboratories, London, UK.
C EnglishInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
GOSgeneGenetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
N LenchGreat Ormond Street Hospital North East Thames Regional Genetics Service Laboratories, London, UK.
A J CoppDevelopmental Biology and Cancer, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
G E MooreGenetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
N D E GreeneDevelopmental Biology and Cancer, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
P StanierGenetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0801124Medical Research Council MR/K022741/1Medical Research Council MR/N003713/1Medical Research Council N003713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural tube defects (NTDs) affecting the brain (anencephaly) are lethal before or at birth, whereas lower spinal defects (spina bifida) may lead to lifelong neurological handicap. Collectively, NTDs rank among the most common birth defects worldwide. This study focuses on anencephaly, which despite having a similar frequency to spina bifida and being the most common type of NTD observed in mouse models, has had more limited inclusion in genetic studies. A genetic influence is strongly implicated in determining risk of NTDs and a molecular diagnosis is of fundamental importance to families both in terms of understanding the origin of the condition and for managing future pregnancies. Here we used a custom panel of 191 NTD candidate genes to screen 90 patients with cranial NTDs (n = 85 anencephaly and n = 5 craniorachischisis) with a targeted exome sequencing platform. After filtering and comparing to our in-house control exome database (N = 509), we identified 397 rare variants (minor allele frequency, MAF < 1%), 21 of which were previously unreported and predicted damaging. This included 1 frameshift (PDGFRA), 2 stop-gained (MAT1A; NOS2) and 18 missense variations. Together with evidence for oligogenic inheritance, this study provides new information on the possible genetic causation of anencephaly.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticAnencephalyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExome SequencingFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansMaleMiceMutationNeural Tube DefectsPhenotypePregnancySkullSpinal Dysraphismanencephalycraniorachischisismolecular diagnosisneural tube defectstargeted exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29205322
PMCPMC5887939
OpenAlexW2774242548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.