Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205312›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Disparities in ovarian cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Sherri L Stewart, Rhea Harewood, Melissa Matz, Sun Hee Rim, Susan A Sabatino, Kevin C Ward, Hannah K Weir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combination of transvaginal ultrasound with cervical cancer screening contributes to early detection of ovarian cancer: Clinical trial.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Refine Risk and Outcomes in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in Australia.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer care: a survey report on global patterns of care, current practices, and barriers.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sherri L StewartDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rhea HarewoodCancer Survival Group, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Melissa MatzCancer Survival Group, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sun Hee RimDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susan A SabatinoDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kevin C WardRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Hannah K WeirDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6568-9708

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States. This study reports ovarian cancer survival by state, race, and stage at diagnosis using data from the CONCORD-2 study, the largest and most geographically comprehensive, population-based survival study to date.

methodsData from women diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2001 and 2009 from 37 states, covering 80% of the US population, were used in all analyses. Survival was estimated up to 5 years and was age standardized and adjusted for background mortality (net survival) using state-specific and race-specific life tables.

resultsAmong the 172,849 ovarian cancers diagnosed between 2001 and 2009, more than one-half were diagnosed at distant stage. Five-year net survival was 39.6% between 2001 and 2003 and 41% between 2004 and 2009. Black women had consistently worse survival compared with white women (29.6% from 2001-2003 and 31.1% from 2004-2009), despite similar stage distributions. Stage-specific survival for all races combined between 2004 and 2009 was 86.4% for localized stage, 60.9% for regional stage, and 27.4% for distant stage.

conclusionsThe current data demonstrate a large and persistent disparity in ovarian cancer survival among black women compared with white women in most states. Clinical and public health efforts that ensure all women who are diagnosed with ovarian cancer receive appropriate, guidelines-based treatment may help to decrease these disparities. Future research that focuses on the development of new methods or modalities to detect ovarian cancer at early stages, when survival is relatively high, will likely improve overall US ovarian cancer survival. Cancer 2017;123:5138-59. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesRegistriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsUnited StatesWhite PeopleYoung Adultcancer registriesovarian cancerpopulation-based survivalsurveillancesurvival

Identifiers

PMID29205312
PMCPMC5785937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.