ArticleCancer2017
Rectal cancer survival in the United States by race and stage, 2001 to 2009: Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.
Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Continuous Care Model of Information-Based Hospital-Family Integration on Colostomy Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Trial
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Evaluation and Management.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026Review
- Organ preservation, for rectal cancer: general overview of the latest data from phase III randomized trials.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Review
- Racial comparisons in treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma and survival in the military health system.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Factors Associated With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Recent racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with rectal cancer.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance in the detection of local recurrence after radical rectal cancer surgery is limited? A retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Improvement of Survival over Time for Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Prognostic Factors Affecting Short- and Long-Term Recurrence-Free Survival of Patients with Rectal Cancer using Cure Models: A Cohort Study.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Rectal cancer in the young: analysis of contributing factors and surgical outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- Increased cancer-specific mortality of very small size in carcinoembryonic antigen-elevated rectal cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.JAMA surgery · 2019Article
- Formation of Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells Involves in the Prognostic Value of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2019Article
- Article
- Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: survival and prognostic factors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Population-based cancer survival in the United States: Data, quality control, and statistical methods.Cancer · 2017Article
- Population-based cancer survival (2001 to 2009) in the United States: Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.Cancer · 2017Article
- Lung cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.Cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the first CONCORD study, 5-year survival for patients with diagnosed with rectal cancer between 1990 and 1994 was <60%, with large racial disparities noted in the majority of participating states. We have updated these findings to 2009 by examining population-based survival by stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, race, and calendar period.
methodsData from the CONCORD-2 study were used to compare survival among individuals aged 15 to 99 years who were diagnosed in 37 states encompassing up to 80% of the US population. We estimated net survival up to 5 years after diagnosis correcting for background mortality with state-specific and race-specific life table. Survival estimates were age-standardized with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. We present survival estimates by race (all, black, and white) for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting the data for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Summary Stage 2000.
resultsThere was a small increase in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year net survival between 2001-2003 (84.6%, 70.7%, and 63.2%, respectively), and 2004-2009 (85.1%, 71.5%, and 64.1%, respectively). Black individuals were found to have lower 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival than white individuals in both periods; the absolute difference in survival between black and white individuals declined only for 5-year survival. Black patients had lower 5-year survival than whites at each stage at the time of diagnosis in both time periods.
conclusionsThere was little improvement noted in net survival for patients with rectal cancer, with persistent disparities noted between black and white individuals. Additional investigation is needed to identify and implement effective interventions to ensure the consistent and equitable use of high-quality screening, diagnosis, and treatment to improve survival for patients with rectal cancer. Cancer 2017;123:5037-58. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.