Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205294›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2018

Wearable Devices in Clinical Trials: Hype and Hypothesis.

Elena S Izmailova, John A Wagner, Eric D Perakslis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04425720 (Use of Remote Patient Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 136 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04425720 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Use of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Platform for COVID-19 Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2020 to 2021Enrolled300ConditionsCOVIDArmsLifeSignals Biosensor 1AX*, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena S IzmailovaTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
John A WagnerTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Eric D PerakslisTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of innovative wearable technologies has raised great interest in new means of data collection in healthcare and biopharmaceutical research and development. Multiple applications for wearables have been identified in a number of therapeutic areas; however, researchers face many challenges in the clinic, including scientific methodology as well as regulatory, legal, and operational hurdles. To facilitate further evaluation and adoption of these technologies, we highlight methodological and logistical considerations for implementation in clinical trials, including key elements of analytical and clinical validation in the specific context of use (COU). Additionally, we provide an assessment of the maturity of the field and successful examples of recent clinical experiments.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicWearable Electronic DevicesActigraphyBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryData CollectionElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryElectroencephalographyGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMedication AdherenceMobile ApplicationsOximetrySkin TemperatureSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID29205294
PMCPMC6032822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.