Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205185›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Knowledge, attitude, and practices of primary health care physicians toward colorectal cancer screening.

Mahmoud Mosli, Yaser Alnahdi, Abdusalam Alghamdi, Mohammad Baabdullah, Afnan Hadadi, Khaleel Khateery, Ibrahim Alsulami, Abdulaziz AlHoqail, Majid Almadi, Hani Jawa and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening: Providers' Perspective.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The gap between knowledge and undergoing colorectal cancer screening using the Health Belief Model: A national survey.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
  20. Colorectal cancer: A looming threat, opportunities, and challenges for the Saudi population and its healthcare system.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud MosliDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Yaser AlnahdiDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdusalam AlghamdiDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad BaabdullahDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Afnan HadadiDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Khaleel KhateeryDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim AlsulamiDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlHoqailDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Majid AlmadiDivision of Gastroenterology, King Saud Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Hani JawaDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Emad AljahdliDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Salem BazarahDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Yousif QariDepartment of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimEarly diagnosis of chronic illnesses and cancers mainly occurs at primary health care centers (PHCs) by primary health care physicians (PHPs). The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is rising and this has been attributed to many factors. The increasing incidence of CRC is compounded by nonadherence to screening recommendations. Therefore, evaluating PHPs knowledge, attitudes, and practices of screening for CRC is clinically important. We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of PHPs regarding CRC screening and to identify the factors associated with nonadherence of PHPs to screening recommendations. MATERIALS AND

methodsPHPs working at three tertiary care centers and PHCs across the city of Jeddah were randomly recruited. Participants were surveyed using a comprehensive questionnaire that recorded data on demographics, qualifications, and knowledge of various modalities and guidelines related to CRC screening. Perspectives about effectiveness of, or adherence to, factors that influence physicians' perspectives or recommendations for CRC screening were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify physician characteristics associated with PHPs perspectives and nonadherence to CRC screening.

resultsA total of 127 PHPs were recruited. The average age of participants was 34 (±8.4) years, 86.6% were native Saudi's and 56.7% were females. The majority of surveys (66.9%) were completed at 24 PHCs and the remaining at hospital-based family medicine clinics. Most of the PHPs (55%) had a bachelor's degree and 31.5% were board-certified or carried a PhD in family medicine; 95% of participants believed that CRC screening in general was effective, but as much as 55% reported that they did not practice screening. The male physicians [odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.19-0.99, P = 0.048)] and PHPs with only a bachelor degree or less (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.93, P = 0.011) were less likely to recommend screening for CRC.

conclusionsA considerable proportion of PHPs do not adhere to CRC screening recommendations despite a wide belief that screening is effective. Male PHPs with lower qualifications appear to be less likely to recommend screening.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareSaudi ArabiaTertiary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29205185
PMCPMC5738794
OpenAlexW2776002882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.