Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205182›Full record

SynthesisSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis.

Karn Wijarnpreecha, Panadeekarn Panjawatanan, Charat Thongprayoon, Veeravich Jaruvongvanich, Patompong Ungprasert

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karn WijarnpreechaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York, USA.
Panadeekarn PanjawatananDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Charat ThongprayoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York, USA.
Veeravich JaruvongvanichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.
Patompong UngprasertDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Bassett Medical Center · USChiang Mai University · THUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been demonstrated in recent epidemiologic studies although the results were inconsistent. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize all available data and to estimate the risk of NAFLD among patients with GERD. MATERIALS AND

methodsComprehensive literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE database from inception through November 2016, to identify studies that compared the risk of NAFLD among patients with GERD versus those without GERD. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined using the random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.

resultsEight studies (four cross-sectional studies and four case-control studies) with 31,322 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of NAFLD among patients with GERD was significantly higher than those without GERD with the pooled odds ratio of 2.07 (95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.79). The statistical heterogeneity was high with an I2 of 87%.

conclusionsA significantly increased risk of NAFLD among patients with GERD was observed in this meta-analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseOdds RatioRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29205182
PMCPMC5738791
OpenAlexW2779109975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.