Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29205081›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2018

Uncovering mechanisms of nuclear degradation in keratinocytes: A paradigm for nuclear degradation in other tissues.

Clare Rogerson, Daniele Bergamaschi, Ryan F L O'Shaughnessy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Erythroblast enucleation at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effects of Heat-KilledMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clare Rogersona Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research , Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London , London , UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1837-1788
Daniele Bergamaschia Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research , Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London , London , UK.
Ryan F L O'Shaughnessya Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research , Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London , London , UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3701-0267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic nuclei are essential organelles, storing the majority of the cellular DNA, comprising the site of most DNA and RNA synthesis, controlling gene expression and therefore regulating cellular function. The majority of mammalian cells retain their nucleus throughout their lifetime, however, in three mammalian tissues the nucleus is entirely removed and its removal is essential for cell function. Lens fibre cells, erythroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes all lose their nucleus in the terminal differentiation pathways of these cell types. However, relatively little is known about the pathways that lead to complete nuclear removal and about how these pathways are regulated. In this review, we aim to discuss the current understanding of nuclear removal mechanisms in these three cell types and expand upon how recent studies into nuclear degradation in keratinocytes, an easily accessible experimental model, could contribute to a wider understanding of these molecular mechanisms in both health and pathology.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusDNAHumansKeratinocytesDNAdenucleationenucleationerythrocyteskeratinocyteslens fibre cellsnuclear degradationnucleophagyreticulocytes

Identifiers

PMID29205081
PMCPMC5973266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.