Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204972›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

Interprofessional Collaboration: A Qualitative Study of Non-Physician Perspectives on Resident Competency.

Mariposa Garth, Alexandra Millet, Emily Shearer, Sara Stafford, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Janine Bruce, Erika Schillinger, Alistair Aaronson, David Svec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perceptions of nurses, pharmacists and physicians about medication reconciliation: A multicenter study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariposa GarthStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. mgarthp@stanford.edu.
Alexandra MilletStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Emily ShearerStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sara StaffordStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sylvia Bereknyei MerrellStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Janine BruceStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Erika SchillingerStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alistair AaronsonStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
David SvecStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) includes the ability to collaborate in an interprofessional team as a core professional activity that trainees should be able to complete on day 1 of residency (Med Sci Educ. 26:797-800, 2016). The training that medical students require in order to achieve this competency, however, is not well established (Med Sci Educ. 26:457-61, 2016), and few studies have examined non-physician healthcare professionals' perspectives regarding resident physicians' interprofessional skills.

objectiveThis study aims to describe non-physicians' views on barriers to collaboration with physicians, as well as factors that contribute to good collaborative relationships.

participantsNurses, social workers, case managers, dietitians, rehabilitation therapists, and pharmacists at one academic medical center, largely working in the inpatient setting. APPROACH: A qualitative study design was employed. Data were collected from individual interviews and focus groups comprising non-physician healthcare professionals. KEY

resultsKnowledge gaps identified as impeding interprofessional collaboration included inadequate understanding of current roles, potential roles, and processes for non-physician healthcare professionals. Specific physician behaviors that were identified as contributing to good collaborative relationships included mutual support such as backing up other team members and prioritizing multidisciplinary rounds, and communication including keeping team members informed, asking for their input, physicians explaining their rationale, and practicing joint problem-solving with non-physicians.

conclusionsDiscussion of how physician trainees can best learn to collaborate as members of an interprofessional team must include non-physician perspectives. Training designed to provide medical students and residents with a better understanding of non-physician roles and to enhance mutual support and communication skills may be critical in achieving the AAMC's goals of making physicians effective members of interprofessional teams, and thus improving patient-centered care. We hope that medical educators will include these areas identified as important by non-physicians in targeted team training for their learners.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsQualitative ResearchClinical CompetenceFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInternship and ResidencyMalecommunication skillsinterprofessional collaborationinterprofessional educationmedical educationnursingqualitative researchshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID29204972
PMCPMC5880757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.