Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204931›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dyslexia2018

Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia.

Sanne M Kuster, Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Marjolein Gompel, Anna M T Bosman

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dyslexia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating a Photogrammetry-Based Video for Undergraduate Anatomy Education.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanne M KusterBehavioural Science Institute & Department of Special Education, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525, HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn van WeerdenburgBehavioural Science Institute & Department of Special Education, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525, HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjolein GompelBehavioural Science Institute & Department of Special Education, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525, HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anna M T BosmanBehavioural Science Institute & Department of Special Education, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525, HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. a.bosman@pwo.ru.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In two experiments, the claim was tested that the font "Dyslexie", specifically designed for people with dyslexia, eases reading performance of children with (and without) dyslexia. Three questions were investigated. (1) Does the Dyslexie font lead to faster and/or more accurate reading? (2) Do children have a preference for the Dyslexie font? And, (3) is font preference related to reading performance? In Experiment 1, children with dyslexia (n = 170) did not read text written in Dyslexie font faster or more accurately than in Arial font. The majority preferred reading in Arial and preference was not related to reading performance. In Experiment 2, children with (n = 102) and without dyslexia (n = 45) read word lists in three different font types (Dyslexie, Arial, Times New Roman). Words written in Dyslexie font were not read faster or more accurately. Moreover, participants showed a preference for the fonts Arial and Times New Roman rather than Dyslexie, and again, preference was not related to reading performance. These experiments clearly justify the conclusion that the Dyslexie font neither benefits nor impedes the reading process of children with and without dyslexia.

Indexed as

ReadingWritingChildDyslexiaFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationDyslexiaFontReading

Identifiers

PMID29204931
PMCPMC5934461
OpenAlexW2771477454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.