Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204889›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2018

Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.

Maureen Wilson-Genderson, K Laura Barker, Heather M Gardiner, Maghboeba Mosavel, Jeffrey Thomas, Laura A Siminoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maureen Wilson-GendersonSiminoff Research Group, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Suite 417, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
K Laura BarkerCollege of Public Health, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street, Suite 417, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
Heather M GardinerHealth Disparities Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Ritter Annex, 9th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Maghboeba MosavelDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980430, Richmond, VA, 23298-0430, USA.
Jeffrey ThomasLife Sciences Program, LifeNet Health, 1864 Concert Drive, Virginia Beach, VA, 23453, USA.
Laura A SiminoffCollege of Public Health, Temple University, 1101 W. Montgomery Ave., Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. lasiminoff@temple.edu.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissues from deceased donors provide important data for genomic research and Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) play a significant role. To understand the decisions of families who donated for transplantation and made decisions about donation to the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx), we examined donation decisions of family decision makers (FDMs). 413 families were interviewed by telephone. The OPO staff who made the transplant and research requests completed self-administered surveys; a total of 309 matching surveys from 99 OPO staff were obtained. 76.8% of families donated to the GTEx project. Logistic regression analysis found that FDM consent to GTEx donation was associated with endorsement of policies to promote biobanking (OR = 1.35), positive attitudes about medical research (OR = 1.1), lack of concern regarding a breach of confidentiality (OR = 1.54), comfort with tissue donation (OR = 1.24), and prior authorization to solid organ donation (OR = 3.17). OPO staff characteristics associated with GTEx donation included being female (OR = 3.57), White (OR = 4.97), comfort with hospital staff role in donation (OR = 1.61), and number of topics discussed with families (OR = 57.9). Donor type, FDM attitudes, OPO staff sociodemographics, OPO comfort with the GTEx authorization process, and intensity of discussing research-specific issues were significantly associated with GTEx donation decisions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchDecision MakingFemaleGenetic ResearchHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID29204889
PMCPMC7521139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.