Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204883›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

Multiple analyses of protein dynamics in solution.

Tadayuki Ogawa, Nobutaka Hirokawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tadayuki OgawaDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Nobutaka HirokawaDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. hirokawa@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 16H06372Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 18002013Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 23000013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for accurate description of protein behavior in solution has gained importance in various fields, including biophysics, biochemistry, structural biology, drug discovery, and antibody drugs. To achieve the desired accuracy, multiple precise analyses should be performed on the target molecule, compared, and effectively combined. This review focuses on the combination of multiple analyses in solution: size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), multi-angle light scattering (MALS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), and their complementary methods, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) and mass spectrometry (MS). We also discuss the comparison between the determined molar mass value of not only the standard proteins, but of a target molecule tubulin and its depolymerizing protein, KIF2, as an example. The comparison of the estimated molar mass value from the different methods provides additional information about the target molecule, because the value reflects the dynamically changing states of the target molecule in solution. The combination and integration of multiple methods will permit a deeper understanding of protein dynamics in solution.

Indexed as

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC)KinesinMicrotubuleMulti-angle light scattering (MALS)Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

Identifiers

PMID29204883
PMCPMC5899714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.