Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204879›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

Reconstitution of membrane tethering mediated by Rab-family small GTPases.

Joji Mima

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virus infection and vesicle trafficking.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  2. Membrane trafficking alterations in breast cancer progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Homotypic and heterotypicThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joji MimaInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka University, 3-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. Joji.Mima@protein.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0454-8669
Protein Research Foundation · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane tethering is one of the most critical steps to determine the spatiotemporal specificity of membrane trafficking, which is the process to selectively transport proteins, lipids, and other biological molecules to the appropriate locations in eukaryotic cells, such as subcellular organelles, the plasma membrane, and the extracellular space. Based on genetic, cell biological, biochemical, and structural studies, Rab-family small GTPases and a number of Rab-interacting proteins (termed Rab effectors), including coiled-coil tethering proteins and multisubunit tethering complexes, have been proposed to be key protein components for membrane tethering. Nevertheless, indeed whether and how Rab GTPases and their specific Rab effectors directly act upon and catalyze membrane tethering still remains enigmatic. By chemically defined reconstitution of membrane tethering from purified Rab-family GTPase proteins and synthetic liposomal membranes, recent studies have revealed the intrinsic potency of Rab-family GTPases to physically and specifically tether two distinct lipid bilayers of liposomal membranes. Experimental evidence from these reconstitution studies support the novel working model in which Rab-family small GTPases act as a bona fide membrane tether for mediating membrane tethering events in eukaryotic membrane trafficking.

Indexed as

LiposomeMembrane reconstitutionMembrane tetheringMembrane traffickingRab proteinSmall GTPase

Identifiers

PMID29204879
PMCPMC5899718
OpenAlexW2773657789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.