Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204868›Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Alice Tubbing, Chloë Shaw-Jackson, Lieveke Ameye, Jérôme Colin, Serge Rozenberg, Candice Autin

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Great Challenges Remain for niPGT-A Reliability.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. First Baby Born in Brazil after Simultaneous Diagnosis through Non-Invasive and Conventional PGT-A.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alice TubbingDepartment of Gynaecology, CHU St-Pierre (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Chloë Shaw-JacksonDepartment of Gynaecology, CHU St-Pierre (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium. Chloe_shaw-jackson@stpierre-bru.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7886-2618
Lieveke AmeyeData Centre, Jules Bordet Institute (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Rue Hégèr Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Jérôme ColinDepartment of Gynaecology, CHU St-Pierre (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Serge RozenbergDepartment of Gynaecology, CHU St-Pierre (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Candice AutinDepartment of Gynaecology, CHU St-Pierre (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn investigation into the clinical implications of delayed blastulation (day 5 versus day 6) was carried out for cryo cycles, as heterogeneous results persist in the current literature.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study comparing clinical pregnancies and live births between 178 blastocysts vitrified and warmed on day 5 versus 149 on day 6. The stage of blastocyst development was taken into account and adjustment for confounding factors was performed.

resultsOur results demonstrate a significant difference in clinical pregnancy (43 versus 23% p value < 0.001) and live birth rates (34 versus 16% p value < 0.001) regarding the day of vitrification, in favour of day 5. This difference persisted after adjustment for confounding factors. The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancies and deliveries for the day 5 group compared to that of the day 6 group was 2.83 (95%CI, 1.48 to 5.41) and 2.94 (95%CI, 1.39 to 6.22), respectively. When the stage of development of the blastocyst was taken into consideration, we still observed a significant advantage of day 5 versus day 6 vitrification.

conclusionsDay of vitrification (day 5 versus day 6) appears to be an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Stratification of our cohort was carried out according to the developmental stage, and significant differences persisted. Although the transfer of day 6 cryopreserved embryos remains a viable option, giving priority to a day 5 embryo would reduce the time to pregnancy.

Indexed as

AdultBlastocystCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVitrificationAssisted reproductionBlastocystDay 5Day 6Live birthsVitrification

Identifiers

PMID29204868
PMCPMC5904067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.