ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2018
Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparison of the Storage-Only Deficit and Joint Mechanism Deficit Hypotheses of the Verbal Working Memory Storage Capacity Limitation of Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Trial
- Investigating the test-retest reliability and behavioral correlates of pupil responses in the n-back task.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Domain-general demands that deactivate multiple-demand regions.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Modulation of fronto-parietal and autonomic activity underpins preserved working memory in middle-aged adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Reward boosts cognitive control during working memory maintenance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Uncovering Distinct Drivers of Covert Attention in Complex Environments With Pupillometry.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Cognitive load and visual attention assessment using physiological eye tracking measures in multimedia learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Inter-individual variability (but intra-individual stability) of overt versus covert rehearsal strategies in a digital Corsi task.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The Intensity of Internal and External Attention Assessed with Pupillometry.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Differential aspects of attention predict the depth of visual working memory encoding: Evidence from pupillometry.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Chunking of Control: An Unrecognized Aspect of Cognitive Resource Limits.Journal of cognition · 2023Article
- Does mathematics anxiety moderate the effect of problem difficulty on cognitive effort?Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2022Article
- Pupillometry tracks cognitive load and salience network activity in a working memory functional magnetic resonance imaging task.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Investigating the role of human frontal eye field in the pupil light reflex modulation by saccade planning and working memory.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Sternberg Paradigm: Correcting Encoding Latencies in Visual and Auditory Test Designs.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Is working memory capacity related to baseline pupil diameter?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry.Memory & cognition · 2021Article
- Is Pupil Activity Associated With the Strength of Memory Signal for Words in a Continuous Recognition Memory Paradigm?Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Microsaccadic rate and pupil size dynamics in pro-/anti-saccade preparation: the impact of intermixed vs. blocked trial administration.Psychological research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phasic pupillary responses were used to track the active maintenance of information in working memory (WM). In seven experiments participants performed various change detection tasks while their pupils were continuously recorded. Across the experiments phasic pupillary responses increased as the number of maintained items increased up to around 4-5 items consistent with behavioral estimates of capacity. Combining data across experiments demonstrated that phasic pupillary responses were related to behavioral estimates of capacity. Furthermore, phasic pupillary responses demonstrated WM load-dependent relations only when active maintenance was required. When instructed to passively stare at the items or to drop items from WM, the pupil remained near baseline levels. These phasic pupillary responses also tracked the time course of maintenance demonstrating sustained responses early in the delay period, but declined thereafter. Finally, phasic pupillary responses tracked selection processes at encoding (filtering and pre-cues), but did not suggest evidence for item removal following retro-cues. These results are consistent with the notion that maintaining items in WM requires the allocation of effortful attention and further suggest that phasic pupillary responses can be used to track the active maintenance of items in WM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29204866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.