Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204832›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2017

Plasticity of the Muscle Stem Cell Microenvironment.

Ivana Dinulovic, Regula Furrer, Christoph Handschin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging role of HDAC11 in skeletal muscle biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Adult stem cell niches for tissue homeostasis.Journal of cellular physiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Telocytes: An Emerging Component of Stem Cell Niche Microenvironment.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivana DinulovicBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Regula FurrerBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph HandschinBiozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. christoph.handschin@unibas.ch.

Funding

European Research Council 616830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite cells (SCs) are adult muscle stem cells capable of repairing damaged and creating new muscle tissue throughout life. Their functionality is tightly controlled by a microenvironment composed of a wide variety of factors, such as numerous secreted molecules and different cell types, including blood vessels, oxygen, hormones, motor neurons, immune cells, cytokines, fibroblasts, growth factors, myofibers, myofiber metabolism, the extracellular matrix and tissue stiffness. This complex niche controls SC biology-quiescence, activation, proliferation, differentiation or renewal and return to quiescence. In this review, we attempt to give a brief overview of the most important players in the niche and their mutual interaction with SCs. We address the importance of the niche to SC behavior under physiological and pathological conditions, and finally survey the significance of an artificial niche both for basic and translational research purposes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationExtracellular MatrixHumansMyoblasts, SkeletalRegenerationSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleStem Cell NicheExtracellular matrixMuscle regenerationMuscular dystrophiesSatellite cellsSkeletal muscleStem cell-niche

Identifiers

PMID29204832
PMCPMC5850985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.