Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204810›Full record

Observational studyJournal of genetic counseling2018

High-Risk Palliative Care Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes about Hereditary Cancer Testing and DNA Banking.

John M Quillin, Oluwabunmi Emidio, Brittany Ma, Lauryn Bailey, Thomas J Smith, In Guk Kang, Brandon J Yu, Oluwafemi Patrick Owodunni, Mohammed Abusamaan, Rab Razzak and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with individuals and families: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John M QuillinHuman & Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall St, Richmond, VA, 23298-0033, USA. john.quillin@vcuhealth.org.
Oluwabunmi EmidioMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetics Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brittany MaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lauryn BaileyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas J SmithPalliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
In Guk KangJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brandon J YuChemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Oluwafemi Patrick OwodunniJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mohammed AbusamaanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rab RazzakPalliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joann N BodurthaMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetics Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even at the end of life, testing cancer patients for inherited susceptibility may provide life-saving information to their relatives. Prior research suggests palliative care inpatients have suboptimal understanding of genetic importance, and testing may be underutilized in this clinical setting. These conclusions are based on limited research. This study aimed to estimate genetic testing prevalence among high-risk palliative care patients in a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. We also aimed to understand these patients' understanding of, and attitudes toward, hereditary cancer testing and DNA banking. Palliative care in-patients with cancer completed structured interviews, and their medical records were reviewed. Among patients at high risk for hereditary cancer, we assessed history of genetic testing/DNA banking; and related knowledge and attitudes. Among 24 high-risk patients, 14 (58.3%) said they/their relatives had genetic testing or they had been referred for a genetics consultation. Of the remaining 10 patients, seven (70%) said they would "probably" or "definitely" get tested. Patients who had not had testing were least concerned about the impact of future testing on their family relationships; two (20%) said they were "extremely concerned" about privacy related to genetic testing. Of patients without prior testing, five (50%) said they had heard or read "a fair amount" about genetic testing. No high-risk patients had banked DNA. Overall, 23 (95.8%) said they had heard or read "almost nothing" or "relatively little" about DNA banking. Written materials and clinician discussion were most preferred ways to learn about genetic testing and DNA banking. Overall, this study demonstrates underutilization of genetics services at the end of life continues to be problematic, despite high patient interest.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePalliative CareAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCancerDNA bankingEnd of lifeGenetic testingPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID29204810
OpenAlexW2772217171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.