ReviewJournal of plant research2018
Monitoring circadian rhythms of individual cells in plants.
Review in Journal of plant research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphofunctional State of the Liver Under Conditions of Three-Month Dark Deprivation: The Influence of Circadian Disruptions and Melatonin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A CRISPR/Cas9-induced restoration of bioluminescence reporter system for single-cell gene expression analysis in plants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Photoperiod and Circadian Regulation in Plants: A Review of Insights from In Vitro Studies.Biology · 2025Review
- Return of the Lemnaceae: duckweed as a model plant system in the genomics and postgenomics era.The Plant cell · 2021Article
- Review
- Crosstalk in the darkness: bulb vernalization activates meristem transition via circadian rhythm and photoperiodic pathway.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Use of a duckweed species,Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Article
- Long-term monitoring of bioluminescence circadian rhythms of cells in a transgenicPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Article
- Opening new avenues for plant developmental research.Journal of plant research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian clock is an endogenous timing system based on the self-sustained oscillation in individual cells. These cellular circadian clocks compose a multicellular circadian system working at respective levels of tissue, organ, plant body. However, how numerous cellular clocks are coordinated within a plant has been unclear. There was little information about behavior of circadian clocks at a single-cell level due to the difficulties in monitoring circadian rhythms of individual cells in an intact plant. We developed a single-cell bioluminescence imaging system using duckweed as the plant material and succeeded in observing behavior of cellular clocks in intact plants for over a week. This imaging technique quantitatively revealed heterogeneous and independent manners of cellular clock behaviors. Furthermore, these quantitative analyses uncovered the local synchronization of cellular circadian rhythms that implied phase-attractive interactions between cellular clocks. The cell-to-cell interaction looked to be too weak to coordinate cellular clocks against their heterogeneity under constant conditions. On the other hand, under light-dark conditions, the heterogeneity of cellular clocks seemed to be corrected by cell-to-cell interactions so that cellular clocks showed a clear spatial pattern of phases at a whole plant level. Thus, it was suggested that the interactions between cellular clocks was an adaptive trait working under day-night cycles to coordinate cellular clocks in a plant body. These findings provide a novel perspective for understanding spatio-temporal architectures in the plant circadian system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29204752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.