Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204737›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2018

Initial Slovenian experience with MitraClip therapy : Careful selection of patients is crucial for optimal outcome.

Jana Ambrožič, Marta Cvijič, Mojca Bervar, Špela Mušič, Matjaž Bunc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jana AmbrožičClinical Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. jana.ambrozic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-7244
Marta CvijičClinical Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mojca BervarClinical Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Špela MušičClinical Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matjaž BuncClinical Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMitraClip is a percutaneous mitral repair technology increasingly used for high surgical risk patients with primary or secondary mitral regurgitation. We describe initial Slovenian experience with MitraClip and discuss the importance of identifying the suitable candidates for this procedure.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the first 10 patients (mean age 75.6 ± 6.9 years, logistic Euroscore 28.4 ± 10.9%) with severe and moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (8 secondary, 1 primary and 1 mixed etiology) who underwent a MitraClip procedure between January 2015 and February 2017.

resultsAcute reduction of mitral regurgitation was achieved in all but one patient (90%). There were no periprocedural mortalities and at short to mid-term follow-up (median 12 months, interquartile range 3-15 months). In eight patients improvement of functional class was observed at discharge. No functional improvement was achieved in a patient with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy, and in a patient with degenerative mitral disease in whom the MitraClip procedure had failed necessitating mitral valve surgery. One patient experienced late leaflet detachment and was effectively managed with a second MitraClip procedure. There were two vascular complications at the access site and one percutaneous closure of an iatrogenic atrial septal defect.

conclusionOur initial experiences with a small number of patients indicate that percutaneous mitral repair with MitraClip is a feasible and safe method in high-risk patients. Special attention should be paid to careful patient selection including detailed echocardiographic evaluation of mitral valve anatomy, technical performance and final result, particularly at the beginning of the learning curve in order to reduce the rate of serious complications.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac CatheterizationEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesSloveniaSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeEchocardiographyMitraClipMitral anatomyMitral regurgitationPercutaneous mitral valve repair

Identifiers

PMID29204737
OpenAlexW2773575791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.