ReviewHNO2018
[Central and peripheral aspects of noise-induced hearing loss].
Review in HNO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of minocycline and its nano-formulation on central auditory system in blast-induced hearing loss rat model.Journal of otology · 2023Article
- Changes in microRNA Expression in the Cochlear Nucleus and Inferior Colliculus after Acute Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- [Hidden hearing loss-damage to hearing processing even with low-threshold noise exposure?]HNO · 2019Review
- [Reactions in the organ of Corti to electrical stimulation : StED technology for detecting changes].HNO · 2019Review
- GC-B Deficient Mice With Axon Bifurcation Loss Exhibit Compromised Auditory Processing.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noise is an important socioeconomic problem in industrialized countries. Development of efficient treatment options for the audiological phenomena resulting from noise-induced hearing loss requires in-depth understanding of the underlying damage mechanisms causing peripheral and central nervous changes. Mechanical damage, ischemia and excitotoxicity are mainly responsible for noise-induced cell death and biophysical changes in the cochlea. Auditory synaptopathy is an additional consequence. Besides these cochlear pathologies, noise exposure leads to extensive changes within the central auditory pathway. Overstimulation causes early cell loss in the ventral cochlear nucleus just after noise exposure, which is in accordance with enhancement of apoptotic mechanisms within the corresponding timeframe. In contrast to the cell loss in lower auditory structures due to overstimulation, the later significant reduction of cell density in higher auditory structures is due to sensory deprivation. Changes in network homeostasis seem to partially compensate structural losses by modulation of spontaneous activity. However, central nervous processing of auditory information is permanently impaired by the neuroplastic changes. Unfortunately, the various noise-induced peripheral and central pathologies are difficult to treat. New therapeutic approaches are required, particularly for treatment of central nervous processing disorders and auditory synaptopathy, which contribute to audiological phenomena such as tinnitus, hyperacusis and poor speech perception in noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29204664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.