Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2018
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Infants With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- OcclusiveEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies in Neonates.Indian pediatrics · 2025Review
- Less invasive surfactant administration for meconium aspiration syndrome.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Respiratory Physiotherapy Interventions in Paediatric Population with Atelectasis: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Meconium aspiration syndrome: from pathophysiology to treatment.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Meconium aspiration syndrome: a comprehensive review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Review
- Non-invasive ventilation in neonates: a review of current literature.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Routine Tracheal Intubation and Meconium Suctioning in Non-Vigorous Neonates with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Review of Current Evidence and Practices.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2021Review
- Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Effects of melatonin on protecting against lung injury (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Change in neonatal resuscitation guidelines and trends in incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020Article
- Quantitative lung ultrasound to understand pathophysiology and guide surfactant therapy in neonates with meconium aspiration.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as a primary respiratory therapy in meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) has not been studied extensively. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure, when applied in newborns with MAS, may resolve atelectasis by sufficiently expanding partially obstructed small airways and stabilizing the collapsing terminal airways to enhance oxygen exchange. Objective: To compare NCPAP vs standard care in neonates with moderate to severe respiratory failure due to MAS in reducing the need for invasive ventilation. Design, Settings, and Participants: This multicenter open-label, parallel-group (1:1 ratio) randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 5, 2014, to May 26, 2016. Data were collected from 3 tertiary care neonatal intensive care units. All infants admitted with respiratory distress, defined as Downe score greater than 4 and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation less than 90%, were assessed for study eligibility if the chest radiograph was suggestive of MAS and they met the other inclusion criteria: gestation longer than 35 weeks, a birth weight greater than 2000 g, and born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Interventions: Infants were randomly assigned to either NCPAP or standard care (5-10 L/min hood oxygen). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of life. Results: After excluding 14 infants, 67 infants were randomized to bubble NCPAP and 68 infants to standard care. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Infants randomized to the bubble NCPAP group needed mechanical ventilation less frequently in the first 7 days of life compared with standard care (2 [3.0%] vs 17 [25.0%]); odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.43; P = .002). The need for surfactant (3 [4.5%] vs 11 [16.2%]; odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-0.87) and culture-positive sepsis (4 [6.0%] vs 13 [19.0%]; odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.93) were higher in the standard care group. There was an increased duration of oxygen therapy (median [interquartile range], 45.5 [28.0-78.3] vs 26 [20.0-48.0] hours; P = .001) in the standard care group. In the NCPAP group vs standard care group, incidence of persistent pulmonary hypertension (9 [13%] vs 19 [28%]; odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-1.01) and duration of hospital stay (median [interquartile range], 5.0 [4.0-8.8] vs 4.0 [4.0-6.0] days; P = .14) were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: Bubble NCPAP in comparison with standard care for infants with MAS reduces the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of life. Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry, India Identifier: CTRI/2015/03/005631.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.