Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204522›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.

Dror Limon, Frances McSherry, James Herndon, John Sampson, Peter Fecci, Justus Adamson, Zhiheng Wang, Fang-Fang Yin, Scott Floyd, John Kirkpatrick and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A dosimetric and treatment delivery comparisons of the Halcyon and TrueBeam stereotactic plans for one or more brain metastases.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dror LimonDepartment of Oncology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Frances McSherryDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
James HerndonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
John SampsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Peter FecciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Justus AdamsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Zhiheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Fang-Fang YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Scott FloydDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
John KirkpatrickDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Grace J KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to the neurocognitive side effects of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is being used with increasing frequency. The use of SRS is expanding for patients with multiple (>4) brain metastases (BM). This study summarizes our institutional experience with single-fraction, linear-accelerator-based SRS for multiple BM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients who were treated between January 1, 2013, and September 30, 2015, with single-fraction SRS for ≥4 BM were included in this institutional review board-approved, retrospective, single-institution study. Patients were treated with linear accelerator-based image guided SRS.

resultsA total of 59 patients with ≥4 BM were treated with single-fraction SRS. The median follow-up was 15.2 months, and the median overall survival for the entire cohort was 5.8 months. The median number of treated lesions per patient was 5 (range, 4-23). Per patient, the median planning target volume (PTV) was 4.8 cc (range, 0.7-28.8 cc). The prescribed dose across all 380 BM for the 59 patients ranged from 7 to 20 Gy. The median of the mean dose to the total PTV was 19.5 Gy. Although the number of treated lesions (4-5 vs ≥6) did not influence survival, better survival was noted for a total PTV <10 cc versus ≥10 cc (7.1 vs 4.2 months, respectively;

conclusionIn single-fraction SRS for patients with multiple BM, smaller total tumor volume, higher total dose, and lower volume of normal brain receiving >12 Gy were associated with increased survival. These data suggest that using SRS for the treatment of multiple BM is efficacious and that outcomes may be affected more by total tumor volume than by the number of lesions.

Identifiers

PMID29204522
PMCPMC5707418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.