Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204424›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2017

3-D Bioprinting of Neural Tissue for Applications in Cell Therapy and Drug Screening.

Michaela Thomas, Stephanie M Willerth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent advances in 3D printing applications for CNS tumours.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. In Vitro Models for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advances in currentFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. 3D Bioprinting of Neural Tissues.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021
    Review
  20. A Three-Dimensional Co-Culture Model for Rheumatoid Arthritis Pannus Tissue.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michaela ThomasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Stephanie M WillerthDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases affect millions of individuals in North America and cost the health-care industry billions of dollars for treatment. Current treatment options for degenerative diseases focus on physical rehabilitation or drug therapies, which temporarily mask the effects of cell damage, but quickly lose their efficacy. Cell therapies for the central nervous system remain an untapped market due to the complexity involved in growing neural tissues, controlling their differentiation, and protecting them from the hostile environment they meet upon implantation. Designing tissue constructs for the discovery of better drug treatments are also limited due to the resolution needed for an accurate cellular representation of the brain, in addition to being expensive and difficult to translate to biocompatible materials. 3-D printing offers a streamlined solution for engineering brain tissue for drug discovery or, in the future, for implantation. New microfluidic and bioplotting devices offer increased resolution, little impact on cell viability and have been tested with several bioink materials including fibrin, collagen, hyaluronic acid, poly(caprolactone), and poly(ethylene glycol). This review details current efforts at bioprinting neural tissue and highlights promising avenues for future work.

Indexed as

3-D bioprintingbiomaterialsdrug discoveryneural tissue engineeringneurodegenerative diseasesstem cells

Identifiers

PMID29204424
PMCPMC5698280
OpenAlexW2769038264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.