Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204317›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

BGDMdocker: a Docker workflow for data mining and visualization of bacterial pan-genomes and biosynthetic gene clusters.

Gong Cheng, Quan Lu, Ling Ma, Guocai Zhang, Liang Xu, Zongshan Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gong ChengProtection Research Center of Pomology, Research Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xingcheng, China.
Quan LuResearch Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China.
Ling MaSchool of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Guocai ZhangSchool of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Liang XuInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zongshan ZhouProtection Research Center of Pomology, Research Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xingcheng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, Docker technology has received increasing attention throughout the bioinformatics community. However, its implementation has not yet been mastered by most biologists; accordingly, its application in biological research has been limited. In order to popularize this technology in the field of bioinformatics and to promote the use of publicly available bioinformatics tools, such as Dockerfiles and Images from communities, government sources, and private owners in the Docker Hub Registry and other Docker-based resources, we introduce here a complete and accurate bioinformatics workflow based on Docker. The present workflow enables analysis and visualization of pan-genomes and biosynthetic gene clusters of bacteria. This provides a new solution for bioinformatics mining of big data from various publicly available biological databases. The present step-by-step guide creates an integrative workflow through a Dockerfile to allow researchers to build their own Image and run Container easily.

Indexed as

Bacillus amyloliquefaciensBiosynthetic gene clustersDockerPan-genome

Identifiers

PMID29204317
PMCPMC5712467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.