Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29204228›Full record

ArticleThe open medical informatics journal2017

Evaluation of Effective Dashboards: Key Concepts and Criteria.

Mahtab Karami, Mostafa Langarizadeh, Mansoor Fatehi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open medical informatics journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Lessons from the Development and Deployment of an Interactive Oncological Risk Estimator.... IEEE Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare. IEEE Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. From Data to Decision: Design and Evaluation of a Patient Safety Dashboard.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Information architecture for a patient-specific dashboard in head and neck tumor boards.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahtab KaramiHealth Information Management Research Center (HIMRC), Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan Province Kashan, Iran.
Mostafa LangarizadehIran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran Province, Tehran, Iran.
Mansoor FatehiMedical Imaging Informatics Research and Education Center, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to offer appropriate criteria to evaluate effective dashboards for healthcare organizations.

methodIn a Delphi study, a team of information technology consultants were asked to determine a set of user interface requirements for evaluating, building or selecting the dashboard. In the first round, a list of main features or criteria to be used was determined based on the panel's rating,.

resultsIn this study, it was revealed that a set of key criteria for evaluating the dashboards can be used for all types of dashboards. These criteria were classified into 7 main categories including user customization, knowledge discovery, security, information delivery, alerting, visual design, and integration and system connectivity.

conclusionChoosing good criteria for selecting effective dashboards for healthcare organizations is very critical because these organizations follow a data-intensive and technology-driven environment. This study revealed the importance of key criteria which can guarantee development of an evaluation checklist.

Indexed as

ConceptsCriteriaDashboardEvaluationHealthcareVisualization

Identifiers

PMID29204228
PMCPMC5688382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.