ReviewThe open cardiovascular medicine journal2017
Validation of the EuroSCORE II in a Greek Cardiac Surgical Population: A Prospective Study.
Review in The open cardiovascular medicine journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of mortality based on the EuroSCORE II model in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2025Article
- Performance of the EuroSCORE in coronary artery bypass graft in Colombia, a middle-income country: A retrospective cohort.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Validation of EuroSCORE II Scoring System on Isolated CABG Patient in Indonesia.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Performance of the EuroSCORE II and the STS score for cardiac surgery in octogenarians.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2021Article
- Perioperative risk assessment with Euroscore and Euroscore II in patients with coronary artery or valvular disease.Medicine · 2018Article
- Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery at the National Heart Institute, Kuala Lumpur: a retrospective review.F1000Research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the validity of EuroSCORE II in the Greek population.
methodsA prospective single-center study was performed during November 1, 2013 and November 5, 2016; 621 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. The EuroSCORE II values and the actual mortality of the patients were recorded in a special database. Calibration of the model was evaluated with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and discrimination with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
resultsThe observed in-hospital mortality rate was 3% (
conclusionThe findings of the present work suggest that EuroSCORE II is a very good predictor of in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery, in our population and, therefore can safely be used for quality assurance and risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.