ReviewOphthalmology and eye diseases2017
The Role of Focal Laser in the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Era.
Review in Ophthalmology and eye diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to comment on: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor with and without topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory in centre-involving diabetic macular edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Review of clinical studies and recommendation for a therapeutic flow chart for diabetic macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Review
- Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the German Retina Society, and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Dated August 2019.Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
- Efficacy of navigated focal laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema planned with en face optical coherence tomography versus fluorescein angiography.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- [Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the Retinological Society and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Situation August 2019].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Review
- Effects of qiming granule for diabetic macular edema: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Article
- Role of Inflammation in Classification of Diabetic Macular Edema by Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of diabetes research · 2019Review
- Selective retina therapy enhanced with optical coherence tomography for dosimetry control and monitoring: a proof of concept study.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies.BioMed research international · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo review important studies examining focal laser for diabetic macular edema (DME), to examine real-world data regarding actual treatments patients are receiving, to present long-term visual outcomes in real-world practice, and to suggest an evidence-based approach for the use of focal laser.
methodsThis study is a review of landmark studies evaluating focal laser and pharmacologic therapy for DME. In addition, the authors include a retrospective review of 102 consecutive eyes of 53 patients in our practice setting in rural Alabama. A chart review was performed, and patients were included if they were diagnosed with DME and were treated with both focal laser and bevacizumab. Bevacizumab and focal laser were given on a "as needed basis" at the discretion of one treating physician (J.O.M.). Worse visual acuity or worsening macular edema were indications for additional treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and percentages. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded at baseline and at the end of treatment (mean of 5 years) in the medical record. Primary outcome measures were BCVA, patients with better than 20/40 BCVA, patients with worse than 20/200 BCVA, and patients with stable BCVA.
resultsAnti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are the first-line treatment for DME, but real-world claims data suggest that diabetic patients cannot come in for monthly injections as in large clinical trials. In our series, after a mean of 5 lasers and 5.5 injections, 90% of eyes had stable or better BCVA, 65% were ≥20/40, and only 13% were ≤20/200.
conclusionsLaser treatment for DME remains an important adjunctive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.