Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29203973›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2017

Long-Term Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancers.

Sivakumar Mahalingam, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri, Surendran Veeraiah

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05067413 (A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled Multi-center Study of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Distal Rectal Transection by Using the Traditional Approach vs. Using Transanterior Obturator Nerve Gateway Approach for Ultralow Rectal Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05067413 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled Multi-center Study of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Distal Rectal Transection by Using the Traditional Approach vs. Using Transanterior Obturator Nerve Gateway Approach for Ultralow Rectal Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2020 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsRectal Neoplasms MalignantArmsTransanterior obturator nerve gateway approach, Total mesorectal excision approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effects of Continuous Care Model of Information-Based Hospital-Family Integration on Colostomy Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nutritional Treatment of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sivakumar MahalingamDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr. S. Krishnamurthy Campus, No.18, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai, 600036 India.
Ramakrishnan Ayloor SeshadriDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr. S. Krishnamurthy Campus, No.18, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai, 600036 India.
Surendran VeeraiahDepartment of Psycho-Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery for low rectal cancer often involves a permanent stoma. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) with colo-anal anastomosis is a valuable sphincter sparing surgical procedure that avoids the need for permanent stoma in patients with low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term functional and oncological outcomes following ISR. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent ISR with colo-anal anastomosis in our institution between 2007 and 2015. All patients had a diversion stoma. Bowel function outcomes were assessed prospectively using Wexner incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome score (LARS), and the Cancer Institute Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire. The histological reports were reviewed to assess the oncological adequacy of the surgery. Patterns of recurrence and survival were analyzed in this group of patients. Thirty-three patients who underwent an ISR were eligible for this study. Laparoscopic resection was performed in five patients. All the patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation except the two who received short course radiation and one who did not receive any neoadjuvant treatment. The median distance from the anal verge to the distal edge of the tumor was 3 cm (range 1.5-5 cm). Distal resection margins and circumferential resection margins were negative in all the patients. The 30-day post-operative mortality rate was 3.03%. In 20 patients with a median follow-up of 48 months, the 3-year overall survival was 95%. One patient had recurrence in the para-aortic nodes. No patient had a local recurrence. Bowel function was assessed in 18 patients who had a minimum stoma free period of 1 year. After a median of 43 months following stoma closure, the median Wexner score was 3.56 (range 0-19), median LARS score was 4.78 (range 0-33), and the mean Cancer Institute QoL score was 151.56 ± 15.741. The QoL was average to very high with an overall acceptable quality of life. In this study, ISR was associated with acceptable long-term functional and oncological outcomes. It can be considered as a safe alternative to a permanent stoma in selected patients with low rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Intersphincteric resectionLow rectal cancerNeoadjuvant chemoradiationOutcomeSphincter sparing surgery

Identifiers

PMID29203973
PMCPMC5705496
OpenAlexW2540429996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.