Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29203878›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

ATM and CDK2 control chromatin remodeler CSB to inhibit RIF1 in DSB repair pathway choice.

Nicole L Batenburg, John R Walker, Sylvie M Noordermeer, Nathalie Moatti, Daniel Durocher, Xu-Dong Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Untousling the Role of Tousled-like Kinase 1 in DNA Damage Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Lipodystrophy-associated progeroid syndromes.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole L BatenburgDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-9212
John R WalkerDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5255-895X
Sylvie M NoordermeerLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-9690
Nathalie MoattiLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.
Daniel DurocherLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3863-8635
Xu-Dong ZhuDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. zhuxu@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CALeiden University · NL

Funding

CIHR FDN143343CIHR MOP-285822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CSB, a member of the SWI2/SNF2 superfamily, is implicated in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. However, how it regulates this repair process is poorly understood. Here we uncover that CSB interacts via its newly identified winged helix domain with RIF1, an effector of 53BP1, and that this interaction mediates CSB recruitment to DSBs in S phase. At DSBs, CSB remodels chromatin by evicting histones, which limits RIF1 and its effector MAD2L2 but promotes BRCA1 accumulation. The chromatin remodeling activity of CSB requires not only damage-induced phosphorylation on S10 by ATM but also cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation on S158 by cyclin A-CDK2. Both modifications modulate the interaction of the CSB N-terminal region with its ATPase domain, the activity of which has been previously reported to be autorepressed by the N-terminal region. These results suggest that ATM and CDK2 control the chromatin remodeling activity of CSB in the regulation of DSB repair pathway choice.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairAmino Acid MotifsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinCell Line, TumorCyclin ACyclin-Dependent Kinase 2DNA HelicasesDNA Repair EnzymesHCT116 CellsHumansMad2 ProteinsPhosphorylationPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanCDK2 protein, humanCyclin ACyclin-Dependent Kinase 2DNA HelicasesDNA Repair EnzymesERCC6 protein, humanMAD2L2 protein, humanMad2 ProteinsPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsRif1 protein, humanTelomere-Binding ProteinsTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID29203878
PMCPMC5715124
OpenAlexW2769027349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.