Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29203835›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Purification and functional comparison of nine human Aquaporins produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the purpose of biophysical characterization.

Frederik Bühring Bjørkskov, Simon Lyngaa Krabbe, Casper Normann Nurup, Julie Winkel Missel, Mariana Spulber, Julie Bomholt, Karen Molbaek, Claus Helix-Nielsen, Kamil Gotfryd, Pontus Gourdon and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Enzymatic and Proteomic Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Production of an Active, Human Membrane Protein inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Frederik Bühring BjørkskovDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, OE, Denmark.
Simon Lyngaa KrabbeDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, OE, Denmark.
Casper Normann NurupDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, OE, Denmark.
Julie Winkel MisselDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 41, 2200, Copenhagen, N, Denmark.
Mariana SpulberAquaporin A/S, Nymøllevej 78, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Julie BomholtAquaporin A/S, Nymøllevej 78, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Karen MolbaekDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, OE, Denmark.
Claus Helix-NielsenAquaporin A/S, Nymøllevej 78, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Kamil GotfrydDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 41, 2200, Copenhagen, N, Denmark.
Pontus GourdonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 41, 2200, Copenhagen, N, Denmark.
Per Amstrup PedersenDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, OE, Denmark. PAPedersen@bio.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-8648-9748
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Maribor · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sparse number of high-resolution human membrane protein structures severely restricts our comprehension of molecular physiology and ability to exploit rational drug design. In the search for a standardized, cheap and easily handled human membrane protein production platform, we thoroughly investigated the capacity of S. cerevisiae to deliver high yields of prime quality human AQPs, focusing on poorly characterized members including some previously shown to be difficult to isolate. Exploiting GFP labeled forms we comprehensively optimized production and purification procedures resulting in satisfactory yields of all nine AQP targets. We applied the obtained knowledge to successfully upscale purification of histidine tagged human AQP10 produced in large bioreactors. Glycosylation analysis revealed that AQP7 and 12 were O-glycosylated, AQP10 was N-glycosylated while the other AQPs were not glycosylated. We furthermore performed functional characterization and found that AQP 2, 6 and 8 allowed flux of water whereas AQP3, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12 also facilitated a glycerol flux. In conclusion, our S. cerevisiae platform emerges as a powerful tool for isolation of functional, difficult-to-express human membrane proteins suitable for biophysical characterization.

Indexed as

AquaporinsBioreactorsCholesterolDetergentsGlycopeptidesGlycosylationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansProtein FoldingRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSolubilityTemperatureWaterAquaporinsCholesterolDetergentsGlycopeptidesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID29203835
PMCPMC5715081
OpenAlexW2769037354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.