Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29203793›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Environmental DNA reveals tropical shark diversity in contrasting levels of anthropogenic impact.

Judith Bakker, Owen S Wangensteen, Demian D Chapman, Germain Boussarie, Dayne Buddo, Tristan L Guttridge, Heidi Hertler, David Mouillot, Laurent Vigliola, Stefano Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Judith BakkerEcosystems & Environment Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
Owen S WangensteenEcosystems & Environment Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-348X
Demian D ChapmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 S.W., 8th Street, Miami, Florida, 33199, USA.
Germain BoussarieMARBEC, UMR IRD-CNRS-UM-IFREMER 9190, Université Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, 34095, Montpellier Cedex, France.
Dayne BuddoUniversity of the West Indies, Discovery Bay Marine Laboratory and Field Station, P.O. Box 35, Discovery Bay, St. Ann, Jamaica.
Tristan L GuttridgeBimini Biological Field Station Foundation, South Bimini Bahamas, Bahamas.
Heidi HertlerThe SFS Centre for Marine Resource Studies, Turks and Caicos Islands, UK.
David MouillotMARBEC, UMR IRD-CNRS-UM-IFREMER 9190, Université Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, 34095, Montpellier Cedex, France.
Laurent VigliolaIRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement), Laboratoire d'Excellence Labex Corail, UMR IRD-UR-CNRS ENTROPIE, Centre IRD de Noumea, BP A5, 98800, Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia, France.
Stefano MarianiEcosystems & Environment Research Centre, School of Environment & Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK. s.mariani@salford.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-0553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharks are charismatic predators that play a key role in most marine food webs. Their demonstrated vulnerability to exploitation has recently turned them into flagship species in ocean conservation. Yet, the assessment and monitoring of the distribution and abundance of such mobile species in marine environments remain challenging, often invasive and resource-intensive. Here we pilot a novel, rapid and non-invasive environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach specifically targeted to infer shark presence, diversity and eDNA read abundance in tropical habitats. We identified at least 21 shark species, from both Caribbean and Pacific Coral Sea water samples, whose geographical patterns of diversity and read abundance coincide with geographical differences in levels of anthropogenic pressure and conservation effort. We demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can be effectively employed to study shark diversity. Further developments in this field have the potential to drastically enhance our ability to assess and monitor elusive oceanic predators, and lead to improved conservation strategies.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsCaribbean RegionConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, RibosomalEcosystemElasmobranchiiElectron Transport Complex IVGene LibrarySeawaterSequence Analysis, DNADNA, RibosomalElectron Transport Complex IV

Identifiers

PMID29203793
PMCPMC5715122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.