Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29203785›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Key site residues of pheromone-binding protein 1 involved in interacting with sex pheromone components of Helicoverpa armigera.

Kun Dong, Hong-Xia Duan, Jing-Tao Liu, Liang Sun, Shao-Hua Gu, Ruo-Nan Yang, Khalid Hussain Dhiloo, Xi-Wu Gao, Yong-Jun Zhang, Yu-Yuan Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Structural Insights into the Ligand-Binding and -Releasing Mechanism ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kun DongState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Hong-Xia DuanCollege of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jing-Tao LiuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Liang SunState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shao-Hua GuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ruo-Nan YangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Khalid Hussain DhilooState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xi-Wu GaoDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yong-Jun ZhangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. yjzhang@ippcaas.cn.
Yu-Yuan GuoState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CNChina Agricultural University · CNTea Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pheromone binding proteins (PBPs) are widely distributed in insect antennae, and play important roles in the perception of sex pheromones. However, the detail mechanism of interaction between PBPs and odorants remains in a black box. Here, a predicted 3D structure of PBP1 of the serious agricultural pest, Helicoverpa armigera (HarmPBP1) was constructed, and the key residues that contribute to binding with the major sex pheromone components of this pest, (Z)-11- hexadecenal (Z11-16:Ald) and (Z)-9- hexadecenal (Z9-16:Ald), were predicted by molecular docking. The results of molecular simulation suggest that hydrophobic interactions are the main linkage between HarmPBP1 and the two aldehydes, and four residues in the binding pocket (Phe12, Phe36, Trp37, and Phe119) may participate in binding with these two ligands. Then site-directed mutagenesis and fluorescence binding assays were performed, and significant decrease of the binding ability to both Z11-16:Ald and Z9-16:Ald was observed in three mutants of HarmPBP1 (F12A, W37A, and F119A). These results revealed that Phe12, Trp37, and Phe119 are the key residues of HarmPBP1 in binding with the Z11-16:Ald and Z9-16:Ald. This study provides new insights into the interactions between pheromone and PBP, and may serve as a foundation for better understanding of the pheromone recognition in moths.

Indexed as

AldehydesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesInsect ProteinsMolecular Docking SimulationMothsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant ProteinsSequence AlignmentSex Attractants11-hexadecenal9-hexadecenalAldehydesInsect ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID29203785
PMCPMC5715060
OpenAlexW2770786819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.