Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29203655›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations.

Paul Behrens, Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong, Thijs Bosker, João F D Rodrigues, Arjan de Koning, Arnold Tukker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05832203 (Validation and Effect of the Eats-Up 3.0 Mobile Application With Features of a Balanced and Sustainable Nutrition Diet Recommendation, Healthy Lifestyle, Assessment of Diet Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05832203 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Validation and Effect of the Eats-Up 3.0 Mobile Application With Features of a Balanced and Sustainable Nutrition Diet Recommendation, Healthy Lifestyle, Assessment of Diet Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled180ConditionsHealth Behavior, Overweight and Obesity, Eating Behavior, Calorie OverloadArmsCounseling on planetary health diet with calorie restriction, Counseling on balanced nutrition diet with calorie restriction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Addressing the 2050 demand for terrestrial animal source food.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul BehrensInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands; p.a.behrens@luc.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2935-4799
Jessica C Kiefte-de JongLeiden University College The Hague, 2595 DG, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Thijs BoskerInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
João F D RodriguesInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arjan de KoningInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arnold TukkerInstitute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary choices drive both health and environmental outcomes. Information on diets come from many sources, with nationally recommended diets (NRDs) by governmental or similar advisory bodies the most authoritative. Little or no attention is placed on the environmental impacts within NRDs. Here we quantify the impact of nation-specific NRDs, compared with an average diet in 37 nations, representing 64% of global population. We focus on greenhouse gases (GHGs), eutrophication, and land use because these have impacts reaching or exceeding planetary boundaries. We show that compared with average diets, NRDs in high-income nations are associated with reductions in GHG, eutrophication, and land use from 13.0 to 24.8%, 9.8 to 21.3%, and 5.7 to 17.6%, respectively. In upper-middle-income nations, NRDs are associated with slight decrease in impacts of 0.8-12.2%, 7.7-19.4%, and 7.2-18.6%. In poorer middle-income nations, impacts increase by 12.4-17.0%, 24.5-31.9%, and 8.8-14.8%. The reduced environmental impact in high-income countries is driven by reductions in calories (∼54% of effect) and a change in composition (∼46%). The increased environmental impacts of NRDs in low- and middle-income nations are associated with increased intake in animal products. Uniform adoption of NRDs across these nations would result in reductions of 0.19-0.53 Gt CO

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGreenhouse EffectGuidelines as TopicHumansInternational CooperationRecommended Dietary Allowancesdietary changeenvironmental impactsMRIOsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID29203655
PMCPMC5754780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.