Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202925›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2017

The Investigation of Suspected Fracture-a Comparison of Ultrasound With Conventional Imaging.

Gordian Lukas Schmid, Stefan Lippmann, Susanne Unverzagt, Christiane Hofmann, Tobias Deutsch, Thomas Frese

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06765083 (Can we 'Hear' Femoral Neck Fractures? Ultrasound Guided Diagnosis of Femoral Neck Fractures.), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06765083 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Can we 'Hear' Femoral Neck Fractures? Ultrasound Guided Diagnosis of Femoral Neck Fractures.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrisius Medisch CentrumRan2025 to 2026Enrolled146ConditionsHip Fractures (i.e. Femoral Neck or Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures)ArmsPOCUS of the hip
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound versus X-ray for distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Fracture sonography-review of literature and current recommendations.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Usefulness of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Diagnosing a Trochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Case Report.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gordian Lukas SchmidDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale); Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Computer Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale); Library of Medicine, University of Leipzig.
Stefan Lippmann
Susanne Unverzagt
Christiane Hofmann
Tobias Deutsch
Thomas Frese
Luther University · KRMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound imaging can be used to diagnose fractures in patients with acute trauma. Its main advantages over conventional imaging are the absence of radiation exposure and its greater availability.

methodsA systematic search in electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL) was supplemented by a manual search on the Internet and in the reference lists of pertinent publications. The QUADAS-2 instrument was used to assess the quality of the individual studies retrieved. In the metaanalysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the individual studies were pooled.

resultsThe available information on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of fractures compared with that of conventional imaging (x-ray, CT, MRI) in patients with acute non-life-threatening trauma is summarized. The database search yielded 2153 hits, among which there were 48 studies that were suitable for inclusion in this review. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [0.90; 0.92]) and 0.94 [0.93; 0.95], although the analyzed studies were markedly heterogeneous (I²: sensitivity 74%, specificity 81%). The sensitivity of ultrasound was higher for the detection of fractures of the humerus, the forearm, the ankle, and the long bones in general, as well as fractures in children, and lower for fractures of the short bones of the hands and feet, and in adults.

conclusionStrong evidence supports the use of ultrasound imaging for certain indications in the detection of fractures.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiographySensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID29202925
PMCPMC5729224
OpenAlexW2801188433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.