Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202862›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Coping with Unusual ExperienceS for 12-18 year olds (CUES+): a transdiagnostic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of cognitive therapy in reducing distress associated with unusual experiences in adolescent mental health services: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Suzanne Jolley, Sophie Browning, Richard Corrigall, Kristin R Laurens, Colette Hirsch, Karen Bracegirdle, Kimberley Gin, Francesca Muccio, Catherine Stewart, Partha Banerjea and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne JolleyDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. suzanne.jolley@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-0051
Sophie BrowningSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Richard CorrigallSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Kristin R LaurensSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, QLD, 4014, Australia.
Colette HirschDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Karen BracegirdleSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Kimberley GinSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Francesca MuccioSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Catherine StewartDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Partha BanerjeaSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
Elizabeth KuipersDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Philippa GaretyDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Majella ByrneDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Juliana OnwumereDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Evanthia AchillaDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, King's Health Economics, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Paul McCroneDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, King's Health Economics, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Richard EmsleyCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
King's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0613-31113National Institute for Health Research PB-PG-0613-31113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood 'unusual experiences' (such as hearing voices that others cannot, or suspicions of being followed) are common, but can become more distressing during adolescence, especially for young people in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Unusual experiences that are distressing or have adverse life impact (UEDs) are associated with a range of current and future emotional, behavioural and mental health difficulties. Recommendations for psychological intervention are based on evidence from adult studies, with some support from small, pilot, child-specific evaluations. Research is needed to ensure that the recommendations suit children as well as adults. The CUES+ study (Coping with Unusual ExperienceS for 12-18 year olds) aims to find out whether cognitive behaviour therapy for UEDs (CBT-UED) is a helpful and cost-effective addition to usual community care for 12-18 year olds presenting to United Kingdom National Health Service Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in four London boroughs.

methodsThe CUES+ study is a randomised controlled trial comparing CBT-UED plus routine care to routine care alone. CBT-UED comprises up to 16 sessions, including up to 12 individual and up to four family support meetings, each lasting around 45-60 min, delivered weekly. The primary outcome is emotional distress. Secondary outcomes are change in UEDs, risk events (self-harm, attendance at emergency services, other adverse events) and health economic outcomes. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio after baseline assessment. Randomisation will be stratified by borough and by severity of mental health presentation: 'severe' (an identified psychotic or bipolar disorder) or any 'other' condition. Outcomes will be assessed by a trained assessor blind to treatment condition at 0, 16 and 24 weeks. Recruitment began in February, 2015 and is ongoing until the end of March, 2017. DISCUSSION: The CUES+ study will contribute to the currently limited child-specific evidence base for psychological interventions for UEDs occurring in the context of psychosis or any other mental health presentation.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN21802136 . Prospectively registered on 12 January 2015. Protocol V3 31 August 2015 with screening amended.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescent BehaviorAdolescent Health ServicesChild BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity Mental Health ServicesLife Change EventsAdolescentChildClinical ProtocolsEmotionsFamily RelationsFemaleHumansLondonMaleChildCognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)Community mental healthpsychotic-like experience (PLE)

Identifiers

PMID29202862
PMCPMC5716372
OpenAlexW2775614553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.