Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202711›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2017

Design and validation of a German version of the GSRS-IBS - an analysis of its psychometric quality and factorial structure.

Sarah K Schäfer, Kathrin Julia Weidner, Jorge Hoppner, Nicolas Becker, Dana Friedrich, Caroline S Stokes, Frank Lammert, Volker Köllner

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah K SchäferDepartment of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Kathrin Julia WeidnerUniversity Mannheim, I. Medical Clinic-Cardiology, Pneumology and Angiology Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Jorge HoppnerUniversity Heidelberg, Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicolas BeckerDepartment of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Dana FriedrichSaarland University, Department of Medicine II - Gastroenterology und Endocrinology, Homburg, Germany.
Caroline S StokesSaarland University, Department of Medicine II - Gastroenterology und Endocrinology, Homburg, Germany.
Frank LammertSaarland University, Department of Medicine II - Gastroenterology und Endocrinology, Homburg, Germany.
Volker KöllnerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rehabilitation Clinic Seehof, Lichterfelder Allee 55, 14513, Teltow, Germany. volker.koellner@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-3252
Saarland University · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, a suitable questionnaire in German language is not available to monitor the progression and evaluate the severity of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Therefore, this study aimed to translate the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (GSRS-IBS) into German and to evaluate its psychometric qualities and factorial structure.

methodsThis study is based on a total sample of 372 participants [62.6% female, mean age = 41 years (SD = 17 years)]. 17.5% of the participants had a diagnosis of IBS, 19.9% were receiving treatment for chronic inflammatory bowel disease, 12.1% of the participants were recruited from a psychosomatic clinic, and 50.5% belonged to a control group. All participants completed the German version of GSRS-IBS (called Reizdarm-Fragebogen, RDF), as well as the Gießen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-24) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - German version (HADS-D).

resultsThe internal consistency of the RDF total scale was at least satisfactory in all subsamples (Cronbach's Alpha between .77 and .92), and for all subscales (Cronbach's Alpha between .79 and .91). The item difficulties (between .25 and .73) and the item-total correlations (between .48 and .83) were equally satisfactory. Principal axis analysis revealed a four-factorial structure of the RDF items, which mainly resembled the structure of the English original. Convergent validity was established based on substantial and significant correlations with the stomach-complaint scale of the GBB-24 (r = .71; p < .01) and the anxiety (r = .42; p < .01) and depression scales (r = .43; p < .01) of the HADS-D.

conclusionThe German version of the GSRS-IBS RDF proves to be an effective, reliable, and valid questionnaire for the assessment of symptom severity in IBS, which can be used in clinical practice as well as in clinical studies.

Indexed as

AdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsColonic diseasesIrritable bowel syndromeQuestionnaireQuestionnaire designSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID29202711
PMCPMC5715554
OpenAlexW2775823357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.