Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202705›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Differences in global gene expression in muscle tissue of Nellore cattle with divergent meat tenderness.

Larissa Fernanda Simielli Fonseca, Daniele Fernanda Jovino Gimenez, Danielly Beraldo Dos Santos Silva, Roger Barthelson, Fernando Baldi, Jesus Aparecido Ferro, Lucia Galvão Albuquerque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic analysis of yakAnimal biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of novelEvolutionary applications · 2022
    Article
  9. Changes inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa Fernanda Simielli FonsecaFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil. la_simielli@yahoo.com.br.
Daniele Fernanda Jovino GimenezFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Danielly Beraldo Dos Santos SilvaFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roger BarthelsonCyVerse, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Fernando BaldiFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jesus Aparecido FerroFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucia Galvão AlbuquerqueFaculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

São Paulo State Funding Agency 2009/16118-5São Paulo State Funding Agency 2013/09190-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeat tenderness is the consumer's most preferred sensory attribute. This trait is affected by a number of factors, including genotype, age, animal sex, and pre- and post-slaughter management. In view of the high percentage of Zebu genes in the Brazilian cattle population, mainly Nellore cattle, the improvement of meat tenderness is important since the increasing proportion of Zebu genes in the population reduces meat tenderness. However, the measurement of this trait is difficult once it can only be made after animal slaughtering. New technologies such as RNA-Seq have been used to increase our understanding of the genetic processes regulating quantitative traits phenotypes. The objective of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes related to meat tenderness, in Nellore cattle in order to elucidate the genetic factors associated with meat quality. Samples were collected 24 h postmortem and the meat was not aged.

resultsWe found 40 differentially expressed genes related to meat tenderness, 17 with known functions. Fourteen genes were up-regulated and 3 were down-regulated in the tender meat group. Genes related to ubiquitin metabolism, transport of molecules such as calcium and oxygen, acid-base balance, collagen production, actin, myosin, and fat were identified. The PCP4L1 (Purkinje cell protein 4 like 1) and BoLA-DQB (major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ beta) genes were validated by qRT-PCR. The results showed relative expression values similar to those obtained by RNA-Seq, with the same direction of expression (i.e., the two techniques revealed higher expression of PCP4L1 in tender meat samples and of BoLA-DQB in tough meat samples).

conclusionsThis study revealed the differential expression of genes and functions in Nellore cattle muscle tissue, which may contain potential biomarkers involved in meat tenderness.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMeatMuscle ProteinsMusclesMuscle ProteinsMeat qualityRNA-SeqTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID29202705
PMCPMC5716225
OpenAlexW2771412375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.