Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202692›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2017

A comparative analysis of nonhost resistance across the two Triticeae crop species wheat and barley.

Rhoda Delventhal, Jeyaraman Rajaraman, Francesca L Stefanato, Sajid Rehman, Reza Aghnoum, Graham R D McGrann, Marie Bolger, Björn Usadel, Pete E Hedley, Lesley Boyd and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pathogen-induced biosynthetic pathways encode defense-related molecules in bread wheat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Novel Glycerol Kinase GeneFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Rhoda DelventhalDepartment of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056, Aachen, Germany.
Jeyaraman RajaramanLeibniz-Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466, Gatersleben, Germany.
Francesca L StefanatoDepartment of Disease and Stress Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Colney, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UH, UK.
Sajid RehmanPlant Breeding, Graduate School for Experimental Plant Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708, PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Reza AghnoumPlant Breeding, Graduate School for Experimental Plant Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708, PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Graham R D McGrannDepartment of Disease and Stress Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Colney, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UH, UK.
Marie BolgerInstitute of Botany and Molecular Genetics, BioSC, RWTH Aachen University, 52056, Aachen, Germany.
Björn UsadelInstitute of Botany and Molecular Genetics, BioSC, RWTH Aachen University, 52056, Aachen, Germany.
Pete E HedleyThe James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK.
Lesley BoydNIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
Rients E NiksPlant Breeding, Graduate School for Experimental Plant Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708, PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Patrick SchweizerLeibniz-Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466, Gatersleben, Germany. schweiz@ipk-gatersleben.de.
Ulrich SchaffrathDepartment of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056, Aachen, Germany. schaffrath@bio3.rwth-aachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3691-0888
RWTH Aachen University · DEJohn Innes Centre · GBLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DEGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NLInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas · SYJames Hutton Institute · GBNational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBSoil Conservation and Watershed Management Research · IR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G024987/1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHA631/5-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHW848/3-1Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research no. 855.50.015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonhost resistance (NHR) protects plants against a vast number of non-adapted pathogens which implicates a potential exploitation as source for novel disease resistance strategies. Aiming at a fundamental understanding of NHR a global analysis of transcriptome reprogramming in the economically important Triticeae cereals wheat and barley, comparing host and nonhost interactions in three major fungal pathosystems responsible for powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis ff. ssp.), cereal blast (Magnaporthe sp.) and leaf rust (Puccinia sp.) diseases, was performed.

resultsIn each pathosystem a significant transcriptome reprogramming by adapted- or non-adapted pathogen isolates was observed, with considerable overlap between Blumeria, Magnaporthe and Puccinia. Small subsets of these general pathogen-regulated genes were identified as differentially regulated between host and corresponding nonhost interactions, indicating a fine-tuning of the general pathogen response during the course of co-evolution. Additionally, the host- or nonhost-related responses were rather specific for each pair of adapted and non-adapted isolates, indicating that the nonhost resistance-related responses were to a great extent pathosystem-specific. This pathosystem-specific reprogramming may reflect different resistance mechanisms operating against non-adapted pathogens with different lifestyles, or equally, different co-option of the hosts by the adapted isolates to create an optimal environment for infection. To compare the transcriptional reprogramming between wheat and barley, putative orthologues were identified. Within the wheat and barley general pathogen-regulated genes, temporal expression profiles of orthologues looked similar, indicating conserved general responses in Triticeae against fungal attack. However, the comparison of orthologues differentially expressed between host and nonhost interactions revealed fewer commonalities between wheat and barley, but rather suggested different host or nonhost responses in the two cereal species.

conclusionsTaken together, our results suggest independent co-evolutionary forces acting on host pathosystems mirrored by barley- or wheat-specific nonhost responses. As a result of evolutionary processes, at least for the pathosystems investigated, NHR appears to rely on rather specific plant responses.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAscomycotaBiological EvolutionDisease ResistanceHordeumMagnaporthePlant DiseasesTranscriptomeTriticumAdapted isolateBarleyBlumeriaGlobal transcriptome analysisMagnaportheNon-adapted isolateNonhost resistancePucciniaQuantitative resistanceWheat

Identifiers

PMID29202692
PMCPMC5715502
OpenAlexW2774652657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.