Trial reportTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease2017
Voluntary cough intensity and its influencing factors differ by sex in community-dwelling adults.
Trial report in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the risk of reintubation by cough force assessment using cough peak expiratory flow: a single-center observational pilot study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Observational
- Effect of the Inspiratory Method and Timing of Voluntary Cough on Peak Cough Flow.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of voluntary cough function in community - dwelling elderly and its association with physical fitness.Physical therapy research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCough peak flow (CPF) is widely used for measuring voluntary cough intensity. However, the respective factors that affect CPF are not known. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting CPF by sex in community-dwelling adults.
methodWe recruited participants using posters exhibited at a public gymnasium. Participation was voluntary, and all participants provided informed consent. Nonsmoking community residents (102 males, 49.6 ± 20.2 years of age; 101 females, 51.4 ± 18.4 years of age) participated in this study. The main outcome measures were sex differences in CPF, respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, thorax extension, and grip strength. Factors affecting CPF by sex were analyzed using multiple regression analysis.
resultsAll parameters were higher in men than in women. CPF was affected by thorax expansion at the tenth rib, inspiratory muscle strength and forced expiration in 1 s in men, and thorax expansion at the tenth rib, inspiratory reserve volume, and expiratory muscle power in women. A weak negative correlation was observed between CPF and age ( p = -0.24, p < 0.05) in women.
conclusionsThe factors affecting CPF differed by sex in community-dwelling adults. Clinical Trial Number: UMIN000023912.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.