Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202616›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2018

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.

Irene Korstjens, Albine Moser

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,031 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,031citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06264362 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Developing a Nonpharmacological Pain Intervention for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Dementia

TypeinterventionalSponsorDrexel UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsPain, Chronic, Dementia, Mild, Mobility Limitation, Physical DisabilityArmsTailored Physical Activity Program
NCT07284329 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Efficacy of a Parent-targeted Co-designed Digital Media Intervention to Increase Recruitment Rates Across a Multi-site Randomized Clinical Trial in Canadian NICU's

TypeinterventionalSponsorIWK Health CentreRan2025 to 2026Enrolled787ConditionsConsent ProcessArmsIntervention (Video) Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,031 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. From safety to agency: experiences of self-admission among patients with diverse mental health needs.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Promoting Planetary Health, One Bite at a Time: Examining the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Dietary Behaviour Change Intervention.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

971 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irene Korstjensa Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre for Midwifery Science , Zuyd University of Applied Sciences , Maastricht , The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-468X
Albine Moserb Faculty of Health Care, Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People , Zuyd University of Applied Sciences , Heerlen , The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By 'novice' we mean Master's students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicPublishingQualitative ResearchFamily PracticeResearch DesigngeneralGeneral practice/family medicinepublishingqualitative designs and methodsreflexivitytrustworthiness

Identifiers

PMID29202616
PMCPMC8816392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.