Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202203›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

User needs analysis and usability assessment of DataMed - a biomedical data discovery index.

Ram Dixit, Deevakar Rogith, Vidya Narayana, Mandana Salimi, Anupama Gururaj, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Hua Xu, Todd R Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An interactive fitness-for-use data completeness tool to assess activity tracker data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. DataMed - an open source discovery index for finding biomedical datasets.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  5. Biomedical informatics and data science: evolving fields with significant overlap.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ram DixitUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Deevakar RogithUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Vidya NarayanaUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Mandana SalimiUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Anupama GururajUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Lucila Ohno-MachadoUniversity of California San Diego Health System, Department of Biomedical Informatics, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hua XuUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.
Todd R JohnsonUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

BioCADDIE: Biomedical and healthCAre Data Discovery and Indexing Engine centerU24AI117966 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2014 to 2016
$10.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI117966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present user needs and usability evaluations of DataMed, a Data Discovery Index (DDI) that allows searching for biomedical data from multiple sources. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted 2 phases of user studies. Phase 1 was a user needs analysis conducted before the development of DataMed, consisting of interviews with researchers. Phase 2 involved iterative usability evaluations of DataMed prototypes. We analyzed data qualitatively to document researchers' information and user interface needs.

resultsBiomedical researchers' information needs in data discovery are complex, multidimensional, and shaped by their context, domain knowledge, and technical experience. User needs analyses validate the need for a DDI, while usability evaluations of DataMed show that even though aggregating metadata into a common search engine and applying traditional information retrieval tools are promising first steps, there remain challenges for DataMed due to incomplete metadata and the complexity of data discovery. DISCUSSION: Biomedical data poses distinct problems for search when compared to websites or publications. Making data available is not enough to facilitate biomedical data discovery: new retrieval techniques and user interfaces are necessary for dataset exploration. Consistent, complete, and high-quality metadata are vital to enable this process.

conclusionWhile available data and researchers' information needs are complex and heterogeneous, a successful DDI must meet those needs and fit into the processes of biomedical researchers. Research directions include formalizing researchers' information needs, standardizing overviews of data to facilitate relevance judgments, implementing user interfaces for concept-based searching, and developing evaluation methods for open-ended discovery systems such as DDIs.

Indexed as

data discoveryinformation retrievalmetadatausabilityuser needs

Identifiers

PMID29202203
PMCPMC7378884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.