Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202192›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2017

Enhancing nutrition with pulses: defining a recommended serving size for adults.

Christopher P F Marinangeli, Julianne Curran, Susan I Barr, Joanne Slavin, Seema Puri, Sumathi Swaminathan, Linda Tapsell, Carol Ann Patterson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05281146 (Production of Fortified Biscuit With Chickpea and Crushed Peanut and Evaluating Its Effectiveness in Terms of Its Acceptability and Cognitive Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05281146 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Production of Fortified Biscuit With Chickpea and Crushed Peanut and Evaluating Its Effectiveness in Terms of Its Acceptability and Cognitive Performance: a Pilot Study Among Egyptian Primary School-aged Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Research Centre, EgyptRan2018 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsCognitive PerformanceArmsChickpeas and crushed peanuts fortified biscuit, Cognitive stimulation for the mothers, Cognitive stimulation for students
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher P F MarinangeliPulse Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Julianne CurranPulse Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Susan I BarrDepartment of Food, Nutrition & Health and the Department of Human Nutrition, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Joanne SlavinDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Seema PuriInstitute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Sumathi SwaminathanSt Johns Research Institute, Division of Nutrition, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Linda TapsellSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Carol Ann PattersonPathfinders Research & Management Ltd, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulses, defined as dry-harvested leguminous crops, include several varieties of beans, peas, lentils, and chickpeas. There is no consensus around a recommended serving size of pulses within a balanced diet, which prevents the development of transregional strategies that rely on consistent messaging to drive increases in consumption. The purpose of this review is to define and disseminate an appropriate target for a minimum serving size of pulses on any given day that can be used in international or collaborative strategies to promote the consumption of pulses. Relevant data were reviewed to examine dietary guidelines across jurisdictions, determine consumption levels of pulses across the globe, evaluate the nutritional composition of pulses in the context of dietary nutrient insufficiency, and assess the impact of pulses on dietary quality. Across a variety of pulses, 100 g of cooked pulses aligned with most regional serving sizes for pulses and provides significant levels of nutrients that are underconsumed by specific age-sex groups. Moreover, 100 g of pulses provides a number of nutrients that qualify for nutrient content claims under regional regulatory frameworks. The data demonstrate that 100 g or 125 mL (0.5 metric cup) of cooked pulses is a reasonable target for aligning strategies that promote the dietary and nutritional attributes of these legumes.

Indexed as

DietFabaceaeFeeding BehaviorHealth PromotionNutrition PolicyServing SizeAdultHumansNutritional StatusNutritive ValueVegetablesbeanschickpeaslentilsnutrient recommendationnutritionpeaspulsesregulatory

Identifiers

PMID29202192
PMCPMC5914352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.