Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29202052›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2016

Moving from medical to health systems classifications of deaths: extending verbal autopsy to collect information on the circumstances of mortality.

Lucia D'Ambruoso, Kathleen Kahn, Ryan G Wagner, Rhian Twine, Barry Spies, Maria van der Merwe, F Xavier Gómez-Olivé, Stephen Tollman, Peter Byass

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Healthcare access for children in a low-income area in Cape Town: A mixed-methods case study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucia D'AmbruosoInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Kathleen KahnUmeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ryan G WagnerUmeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Rhian TwineMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Barry SpiesDirectorate for Maternal, Child, Women and Youth Health and Nutrition, Mpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, Mpumalanga South Africa.
Maria van der MerweDirectorate for Maternal, Child, Women and Youth Health and Nutrition, Mpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, Mpumalanga South Africa.
F Xavier Gómez-OlivéMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Stephen TollmanUmeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Peter ByassInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N005597/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVerbal autopsy (VA) is a health surveillance technique used in low and middle-income countries to establish medical causes of death (CODs) for people who die outside hospitals and/or without registration. By virtue of the deaths it investigates, VA is also an opportunity to examine social exclusion from access to health systems. The aims were to develop a system to collect and interpret information on social and health systems determinants of deaths investigated in VA.

methodsA short set of questions on care pathways, circumstances and events at and around the time of death were developed and integrated into the WHO 2012 short form VA (SF-VA). Data were subsequently analysed from two census rounds in the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance Site (HDSS), South Africa in 2012 and 2013 where the SF-VA had been applied. InterVA and descriptive analysis were used to calculate cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs), and to examine responses to the new indicators and whether and how they varied by medical CODs and age/sex sub-groups.

resultsOne thousand two hundred forty-nine deaths were recorded in the Agincourt HDSS censuses in 2012-13 of which 1,196 (96 %) had complete VA data. Infectious and non-communicable conditions accounted for the majority of deaths (47 % and 39 % respectively) with smaller proportions attributed to external, neonatal and maternal causes (5 %, 2 % and 1 % respectively). 5 % of deaths were of indeterminable cause. The new indicators revealed multiple problems with access to care at the time of death: 39 % of deaths did not call for help, 36 % found care unaffordable overall, and 33 % did not go to a facility. These problems were reported consistently across age and sex sub-groups. Acute conditions and younger age groups had fewer problems with overall costs but more with not calling for help or going to a facility. An illustrative health systems interpretation suggests extending and promoting existing provisions for transport and financial access in this setting.

conclusionsSupplementing VA with questions on the circumstances of mortality provides complementary information to CSMFs relevant for health planning. Further contextualisation of the method and results are underway with health systems stakeholders to develop the interpretation sequence as part of a health policy and systems research approach.

Indexed as

Civil registration and vital statisticsHealth surveillanceHealth systemsSocial determinantsSouth AfricaVerbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID29202052
PMCPMC5675065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.