Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29201989›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2017

Geographic disparities in the distribution of the U.S. gynecologic oncology workforce: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology study.

Stephanie Ricci, Ana I Tergas, Kara Long Roche, Melissa Gerardi Fairbairn, Kimberly L Levinson, Sean C Dowdy, Robert E Bristow, Micael Lopez, Katrina Slaughter, Kathleen Moore and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. "It really takes a village": perspectives on multi-level barriers to endometrial cancer care for rural patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Geographic distance to Commission on Cancer-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Disparity of ovarian cancer survival between urban and rural settings.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie RicciThe Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ana I TergasDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Kara Long RocheDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Melissa Gerardi FairbairnThe Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly L LevinsonThe Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sean C DowdyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology, Mayo Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert E BristowDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Micael LopezDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Katrina SlaughterDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Kathleen MooreDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Amanda N FaderThe Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Virginia · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USColumbia University · USGeorge Washington University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent ASCO workforce study projects a significant shortage of oncologists in the U.S. by 2020, especially in rural/underserved (R/US) areas. The current study aim was to determine the patterns of distribution of U.S. gynecologic oncologists (GO) and to identify provider-based attitudes and barriers that may prevent GOs from practicing in R/US regions. U.S. GOs (n = 743) were electronically solicited to participate in an on-line survey regarding geographic distribution and participation in outreach care. A total of 320 GOs (43%) responded; median age range was 35-45 years and 57% were male. Most practiced in an urban setting (72%) at a university hospital (43%). Only 13% of GOs practiced in an area with a population < 50,000. A desire to remain in academics and exposure to senior-level mentorship were the factors most influencing initial practice location. Approximately 50% believed geographic disparities exist in GO workforce distribution that pose access barriers to care; however, 39% "strongly agreed" that cancer patients who live in R/US regions should travel to urban cancer centers to receive care within a center of excellence model. GOs who practice within 50 miles of only 0-5 other GOs were more likely to provide R/US care compared to those practicing within 50 miles of ≥ 10 GOs (p < 0.0001). Most (39%) believed the major barriers to providing cancer care in R/US areas were volume and systems-based. Most also believed the best solution was a hybrid approach, with coordination of local and centralized cancer care services. Among GOs, a self-reported rural-urban disparity exists in the density of gynecologic oncologists. These study findings may help address barriers to providing cancer care in R/US practice environments.

Indexed as

Geographic disparitiesGynecologic cancer care

Identifiers

PMID29201989
PMCPMC5699889
OpenAlexW2770498217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.