ArticleEmergency (Tehran, Iran)2017
Intranasal Lidocaine for Primary Headache Management in Emergency Department; a Clinical Trial.
Article in Emergency (Tehran, Iran), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03576820 (Intranasal Lidocaine to Treat Pediatric Migraine in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intranasal Lidocaine to Treat Pediatric Migraine in the Emergency Department
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intranasal lidocaine for acute migraine: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- A randomized controlled pilot study of intranasal lidocaine in acute management of paediatric migraine and migraine-like headache.Paediatrics & child health · 2022Article
- Intravenous Lidocaine Compared to Fentanyl in Renal Colic Pain Management; a Randomized Clinical Trial.Emergency (Tehran, Iran) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMost of the headache cases only require pain management in emergency department (ED). The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal lidocaine in this regard.
methodIn this clinical trial, adult patients with primary headache were randomly treated with 7.5 mg intravenous (IV) chlorpromazine and 1 ml intranasal lidocaine 2% (treatment) or normal saline 0.9% (placebo), and were compared 5, 15, and 30 minutes later regarding success rate using SPSS 21.
result100 patients were assigned to either treatment or placebo group. Number needed to treat of intranasal lidocaine at 5, 15, and 30 minutes were 4 (95% CI: 2.2 - 6.6), 3 (95% CI: 1.7 - 3.5), and 4 (95% CI: 2.3 - 15.9), respectively. These measures for absolute risk reduction were 30 (95% CI: 15.2 - 44.8), 44 (95% CI: 28.7 - 59.3), and 26 percent (95% CI: 6.3 - 44.3), respectively. Pain relapse occurred in 16% of treatment and 11% of control group within 1 hour of treatment (p = 0.402).
conclusionIt seems that, intranasal lidocaine along with IV chlorpromazine could result in more successful and faster management of primary headaches in ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29201961PMC5703756W2754668474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.